Skip to content
    • Frontal Lobe Override

Fact(mostly), Fiction and Opinion

  • Jefferson Davis for President

    January 19th, 2024

    Disclaimer: I am not now, nor have I ever been a lawyer. I never went to law school. Nor have I read law to a degree that my reading would give me credit in law school. I am just an American with a citizen’s understanding of legal matters.

    Fact:

    Currently, there is a matter before the United States Supreme Court(SCOTUS) regarding Donald Trump’s candidacy for President of the United States (POTUS) and the 14th amendment to the United States Constitution.

    Opinion:

    For me, this all boils down to a single question: Would the 14th amendment allow Jefferson Davis or Robert E. Lee become president in 1872? The obvious, and correct, answer is no. That would be something the authors 14th amendment would not have allowed.

    Discussion (Opinion):

    I’ve seen analysts on CNN cite two reasons: Due process and the text of the amendment does mentions several offices, but not POTUS.

    Due Process:

    Analysts, as reported in the media, have asserted that Trump can not be labeled an insurrectionist because he has not been convicted of insurrection. For example, Brian Mounce, guest columnist, for The Tennessean on December 28, 2023 states:

    Colorado did not hold a jury trial to determine if Trump was an insurrectionist, nor provide the evidence to be used against him. Colorado did not adhere to stringent rules of evidence or procedures. And the burden of proof used against Trump was not beyond a reasonable doubt. Rules matter. Due process matters. (www.tennessean.com/story/opinion/contributors/2023/12/28/colorado-supreme-court-trump-presidential-ballot-constitution-due-process-5th-14th-amendments/72049528007/)

    Similar views have been expressed, a lot, since the Colorado rulings. This seems a bit odd. Couy Griffin, a county commissioner in New Mexico, was removed from office for his participation in the January 6, 2023 attack on the capitol. He was convicted trespassing and acquitted on disorderly conduct. He was not even charged with insurrection or rebellion, but a court ruled the 14th amendment barred him from his county commissioner seat.

    There are several other cases where people lose property for criminal activity without criminal conviction. Forfeiture comes to mind. From the FBI website (www.fbi.gov/investigate/white-collar-crime/asset-forfeiture) we see:

    Civil Judicial Forfeiture: Civil judicial forfeiture is a judicial process that does not require a criminal conviction and is a legal tool that allows law enforcement to seize property that is involved in a crime. Referred to as an in rem (against the property) action, it is an action filed against the property itself, rather than a person. In civil judicial forfeiture, an individual has the right to contest the seizure through trial proceedings. The government then must prove that the property facilitated criminal activity or represents criminal proceeds.

    Due process can simply mean as prescribed by law (as interpreted by courts). Additionally, the law must allow for appeals in a courts of law. In the Colorado case, there was a trial, evidence was presented and a judge made a ruling. Due process achieved. The judges ruling included an interpretation which will be discussed below.

    Apparently, each state has its own election procedures and guidelines. In Maine, an elected official declared Trump ineligible for office. Trump can appeal that decision in Maine’s court. Even though there was no trial, due process is attained.

    Of note: Neither Jefferson Davis nor Robert E. Lee were convicted of insurrection, rebellion. Davis was indicted for treason and spent time in prison awaiting trial.

    Textual Disagreements:

    One way to read Amendment 14 Section 3 is:

    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

    The other is:

    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

    In short, the trial judge in Colorado read it the first way. The section lists specific elected officials and electors (appointed by states), but fails to list POTUS and Vice POTUS. This is a rather narrow reading of the section. The Colorado Supreme Court read it the second way, a very broad way.

    For some reason, again I’m not a lawyer, the Colorado Supreme Court reaffirmed the lower court’s factual finding that Donald Trump engaged in insurrection. That seemed unnecessary.

    To me, the issue before SCOTUS should be which way to read Section 3. The amendment was ratified in July 1868.

    Opinion:

    July 1868 seems too close to election day to mount an effective campaign, so let’s use 1872.

    For me, the answer to the textual issue boils down to the question above. Would the 14th amendment allow Jefferson Davis or Robert E. Lee become president in 1872? I think, that back then, the answer would be NO. That should be the answer now. There is no way the Union would welcome either men, nor any other confederate, as POTUS. I hope SCOTUS sees it the same way.

    I doubt it will. Republicans have a 6-3 majority in the court. Three supreme court Justices are Trump appointees and Clarence Thomas’s wife, Virginia, agreed with the Trump election conspiracy theory. If several actual lawyers pontificating in the media seem inclined to the first reading of Section 3, then there is room for SCOTUS to rule that way. I think it is wrong. Do they really think Jefferson Davis could have run for president in 1872?

    A trickier question goes something like this: If SCOTUS confirms the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision, does that bar Trump from the presidency?

    On one level, it is up to each state to put him on the ballot. I think SCOTUS will find splitting the US into red states and blue states the most expedient course. States will appoint electors and their ballots will be cast in the Electoral College.

    Should Trump be duly elected, can his claim to office be challenged under the 14th amendment? That can be a little trickier. Trump and the Republicans can put laws in place to make that impractical. Who knows, Trump could extend his one day dictatorship and execute anyone who tries.

  • A Somewhat Successful Idio-protest (One person protest)

    December 5th, 2023

    Fact (despite some obfuscation):

    The following includes a factual account of my own experience conductibg an idio-protest also known as a one-person protest.

    I am still trying to maintain my anonymity, so let’s call my employer LGE for Local Government Entity, and, as in “you can’t fight city hall,” LGE refers to both the edifice and the those who run it.

    In a previous post about doing two small things a day to make the world a better place, an AI writer brought up Greta Thunberg and her efforts to sway Sweden to adopt The Paris Accords. She skipped school and passed out leaflets. Within a week, other Swedish students and their parents joined her movement. As an idio-protest, her’s was short lived.

    In contrast, my idio-protest lasted four months and never broke any laws.

    Background:

    I had been bicycle commuting for ten years. LGE had no shower facilities save for a cold water OSHA shower for chemical burns, and that shower, as undesirable as it would have been, was off limits. I learned to towel bath in the men’s restroom. All LGE’s restrooms were multi-user so no washing behind locked doors, no privacy from other restroom users.

    Towel Bathing at Work:

    Towel bathing logistics requires a little explanation. First, at my desk I kept a bottle of liquid soap. Trader Joe’s Refresh or Tea Tree Tingle worked the best. Also anti-antiperspirant or deodorant and a hairbrush. I kept back-ups for the soap and deodorant because I drove to work one day a week and timing usage didn’t work so well. I also have a pair of office shoes at my desk.

    Every day, I packed my pannier (2500 cubic inch bag hanging off the bike’s rear rack) with a large towel (bath sheet sized ones I also used on gym days) and my office clothes for the day.

    To a large degree, only my upper body sweated. My hair was often drenched. I wore Buffs folded into sweat bands. They absorbed a great deal of head sweat, and, since they are made of microfiber, they dried completely by the end of work. I only washed my torso and arms before changing into my office clothing.

    I removed my jersey. I usually wore a soccer jersey. Like the Buff, they are made of microfiber and dried completely by the time I put it back on for the ride home. For washing I left on my compression shorts and gym shorts.

    Towel bathing follows, roughly, the same process as washing hands. Wet so soap with spreads better, apply soap, lather, rinse and dry. The difference is that the towel is used in these steps. Think of the towel as four (really just three) sections. Wet one section (I choose the corner with sewn on tags) and wring out excess water. Use this section to wet arm and torso. Sometimes, this has to be done multiple times.

    When finished wetting, wring the towel section as best as possible. Apply soap to the towel and work it in a little. Apply soap to skin using the towel section. Make sure the soap lathers. Lather lifts dirt and sweat from the skin, so lather is important.

    Use the section next to the soap section for rinsing leaving the bottom half of the towel for drying. Wet, wring, remove lather with towel and repeat until clean. This is the longest part. It often takes multiple passes to remove all the lather. Bamboo based towels are the most efficient and take up less space in the pannier, so they might be worth the expense.

    Dry using the, well, dry half of the towel. After drying, use the drying half of the towel to dry up any spillage on the floor and counter; it’s only polite.

    I carry a thick plastic bag. Sketchers shopping bags and Performance Bicycle bags worked the best. Remove my office clothes: a dress shirt, pair of slacks and a belt. Place the towel into the plastic bag and then stow the bag back into the pannier. At this point, I slip off my cycling shoes, slip off my gym shorts leaving on compression shorts, put on my office slacks, apply deodorant, adorn my dress shirt, affix my belt and brush my hair. I pack up my soap, deodorant and brush into their own plastic bag (sorry forgot to mention that before) and depart.

    I brought a hat rack to work. Previously, I usually hung my soggy Buff on the hat rack. I now hang my soccer jersey and gym shorts as well. The towel remains packed away in its plastic bag in the pannier.

    Of note: I wear compression shorts throughout the day. As I said, they are perfectly dry after the ride. They are also make of thick lycra-like material and are completely opaque. This is an important detail.

    More Background:

    LGE moves its personal around for new projects and pointless reorgs. My group expanded for a new project. LGE moved us to an area where we were not welcome. A member of upper management told us to be on our best behavior. Admittedly, our core group enjoyed a reputation for elevated amplitude. My manager and I were famous for engaging in debates which let to wagers which I generally won sparking celebratory boasting. So, I interpreted this to cool down on celebrations and, perhaps, debates. By this time, I’d been towel bathing every morning I rode a bicycle to work for ten years.

    In the past, I received complaints in person. I explained the situation and ask for reasonable alternatives. Absent reasonable alternatives, their complaints ceased. In this new location, someone complained to upper management, namely the LGE Divisional HR Manager.

    Remember the hat rack above. At one time, my cubicle was near his office. The cubicle aisle was too narrow to place my hat rack there. I put it outside my cubicle wall near a disused file cabinet. This was also near the HR office. The Divisional HR manager hung his suit jacket on my hat rack. I removed his jacket, hung it neatly off the disused file cabinet and placed a yellow sticky note informing the owner of the jacket that the hat rack was my personal property and that the owner needs to find another place for his jacket (Honestly, I did not know whose it was).

    The Divisional HR Manager sent the Divisional HR Representative to tell me that his boss wants me to cease hanging my underwear out in public. I pointed out that soccer jerseys and gym shorts do not count as underwear, and, given my cubicle location, I’m willing to discuss reasonable alternatives. He returned an hour later to tell me that HR was going to file charges. I’m not sure of my phrasing, but I was willing to prove HR staff’s mental incompetence if they did. The HR Rep was sorta a friend as he was a hobbyist cyclist and we often discussed bicycle components and riding strategies. He laughed and I thought the matter was resolved. The HR Manager, however, took advantage of his position to remind me he was in charge.

    Informal Notice:

    There was a meeting about our groups behavior, and the matter of towel bathing was brought up. I was on vacation that day, and I only found out the next day.

    My manager drew me aside and told me of the meeting. The director of the area where we were not welcome brought up my cleaning activities in the men’s restroom, and the Divisional HR Manager declared, “That’s public nudity.” According to my manager, his changing from an office shirt to a tee shirt for his walk home also counted as “public nudity.”

    I sent off an email asking for clarification, pointing out inconsistencies in the HR Manager’s reasoning and so on. After several exchanges, the HR position was that the only place inside LGE where I could clean myself after riding a bicycle to work was the enclosed toilet stalls.

    Formal Notice:

    A week before the election in which the LGE endorsed a local ballot proposition urging alternate commuting to relieve traffic on city streets, I was called into the HR Rep’s office. He had been given the case. He handed over a formal memo spelling out restricted rights to office restrooms and included the public nudity accusation. I threatened to expose this as unfair treatment. He reminded me of confidentiality requirements. Talk to a reporter without permission, lose your job. Talk to cycling groups about this, lose your job and so on. He also told me he was in possession of a memo from Legal, and I could be much more trouble than I imagined.

    Analysis and Raction (aka More Background):

    I asked for a copy of the Legal memo. I was told that I needed a union rep for that. In California, almost all public employees who are simply workers and nothing like a political appointees are represented by bargaining units. In my case, a union. I contacted my union rep. Both he and I requested a copy of the legal memo. No memo was produced. After a couple of months, I submitted a public records request. After six weeks, I received a notice that no such records exist. I appealed and asked them to ask the HR Rep who claimed possession of the memo. Public records reported that no such memo ever existed.

    For clarification, all restrooms in question were several floors up in a secured building. More importantly, there were “No Trespassing” signs stenciled on all entrances. By California law, anything not visible from outside “no trespassing” signs is considered private, so whatever I was doing was by no means public. As for the nudity part of the accusation, California’s Indecent Exposure (Penal Code 314 PC) seemed the closest entitled law, and towel bathing did not violate state law, not even close.

    California’s Indecent Exposure law (314 PC) must include a sexual component and only includes intentional exposure of genitalia for sexual gratification. Anyone convicted of Indecent Exposure must register as a sex offender. LGE is allowed to use Sex Offender Registries to deny or terminate employment. So the “public nudity” accusation was very serious.

    Because the State’s Indecent Exposure law is applied very narrowly, many local entities (cities and counties) have their own exposure laws. The county had two, one for parks and beaches. The city also had one as well. In this case, the three local Nudity and Disrobing contained similar verbiage. Actually, most municipalities in California with local ordinances and codes regarding nudity has similar language and are probably copies of some original source. They all list several anatomical parts all of which must be covered to avoid nudity violations. My favorite is “natal cleft” or, in the venacular, plumber’s crack.

    Above, I noted that I wore compression shorts at all times while towel bathing. My compression shorts opaquely covered all listed body parts, so, no nudity in the “public nudity” accusation.

    In California Torts, falsely accusing someone of a crime is defamation per se. I actually knew that at the time. I asked around and discovered that LGE fiercely defends itself in lawsuits. It would cost about $200K to pursue a successful law suit against the HR team and LGE. At the time, I didn’t think I could afford a law suit. I could take out a second mortgage, but the cost of losing would be too high.

    I decided to continue pursuing the issue with union representation. Mistake. The union contract expressly forbids the union from pursuing actions against individuals including abusive HR people. It was clear to me, that this was, in part, the Divisional HR Manager trying to “get me.” Okay, forget trying, he had me, and the best way out would have been a law suit against him. Since he could claim he was acting in an official, or ministerial, capacity, I also had to sue LGE.

    In torts, you have to sue everyone who might have liability. Leave someone out, and everyone who was really liable points their fingers at the left out person or entity. After losing that lawsuit, try suing that person, and he’ll point his finger at the others. Two losses. So, even if you end up suing some of your friends, sue everyone and everything who might be liable. Let the court winnow the defendants down. In fact, when filing a tort, you include Does 1 through (let’s say) 99 just in case discovery uncovers another possible liable party.

    The union process took eighteen months. During that time I had to towel bathe over a toilet. To make matters worse, these were automatic toilets. They flushed over and over again, often as many as thirty times, while I tried to clean myself. Google toilet plume. It’s real and it spreads bacteria all over the restroom.

    At first, I felt nauseated from the experience. My body screamed for calories, but forcing food into me took considerable effort.

    Towel Bathing Over A Toilet:

    Much the same as at a sink. The steps are the same, but there is no faucet. As a cyclist, I own several water bottles. It takes two. I always keep spares since you never know when one will escape the bottle cage in traffic and not be worth the risk of retrieval.

    So I set up two opened water bottles up on the handicap rail leaning against the wall.

    Obviously, put the toilet seat up. Ignore the flush.

    To wet the towel for wetting and rinsing the skin, tuck the dry half of the towel between knees, raise the appropriate section over the toilet with one hand and pick up a water bottle and gently pour water from the bottle so that it would only get on the intended section and spillage falls into the toilet.

    Since I have a weak back, repeating this maneuver twenty or so times often exacerbated back aches.

    The rest of the towel bathing procedure went much the same, save, given how men often over esteem their aim, forget about mopping up spillage that missed the toilet.

    Planning The Protest:

    The confidentiality constraint coupled with an unaffordable lawsuit left very few options.

    The HR Rep believed I had none. He as partially correct. I could file a complaint against him and his manager. The union could have no role in that complaint, so I’d be on my own.

    Car dealers get the better of even knowledgeable customers. It’s their arena. They know their cars, they know how much money they have in them, they know how much it costs per day to keep them on their lots, they know hidden flaws in used cars and even new cars. They take advantage of those who did not already arrange financing for the car including interest first loans, as opposed to simple interest loans.

    Filing complaints was HR’s arena.

    It took a week to come up with a two pronged attack. The first prong, filing a complaint against HR staff, failed. LGE has a policy that if you file a complaint against high enough LGE officers, they are handled by the Equal Opportunity Office (EOO). The Divisional HR Manager retired before my union finally agreed they could do nothing to help. The position was unfilled at the time. The HR Rep was still in place. I filed my complaint for bullying, disrespectful treatment and violation of LGE ethics policy for dishonesty regarding the memo from Legal.

    EOO refused the complaint and sent it to the division head, back into HR’s arena. LGE policy about any bullying claim requires a complete investigation in six weeks. Six weeks later, no investigation. It just so happens, the compliance officer was the same EOO who refused my complaint. After two rounds of urging the EOO to insure compliance, no investigation. HR staff squelched my complaint. So much for policies. I’m thankful this was the lesser part of my plan.

    The major part of my plan involved the actual idio-protest. I was going to move, my towel bathing from toiler stalls to the street in front of LGE.

    Preparation:

    Simply getting yelled at for washing myself in front of LGE before my shift started, i.e. while people rushed to start their shifts in time, would be pointless unless I could explain why I am doing it. Confidentiality restrictions prevented disclosure.

    There was a convenient loophole to the confidentiality restrictions. I could always disclose anything in the public record. I produced a handout including the Formal Notification Memo and my own discourse on it. I took the tack that alternate commuting was in LGE’s interest. Their own endorsement of a proposition supported that position. The two main factors people do not ride bicycles to work are fear of car strikes and not being able to clean up for work. Surprisingly, not being able to ferry a pot luck contributions and social isolation or being labeled a freeloadedr is never cited as a concern. The later observation was excluded from my speech. The Memo’s discouragement of cycling and similar alternate commuting was added as it worked against LGE’s stated position. I finished by saying LGE should not forbid hygienic activities in their restrooms which were perfectly legal on the street in actual public.

    I should never be allowed to speak in public. I completely blew my three minutes before LGE’s board. I stammered, stumbled, yammered, but I did pass several copies of the memo and my intended speech to the assistant for board member distribution, and the secretary took a copy to be included into the record. IT WAS IN THE PUBLIC RECORD. So an un-triumphant success.

    The last preparation was to pick a spot in front of LGE. An advantage to idio-protests is, as long as the lone participant does not obstruct access to anything, they require no permit. I chose a spot about twenty feet from the entrance where I could prop up my bicycle against a tree.

    I used the bicycle to help carry my pannier and hold my other supplies. More importantly, I used the Fly-6 camera mounted under my bike’s saddle to record events.

    I presented my materials to LGE’s board on a Tuesday and waited two days for a response. None. I chickened out on Friday. My union rep thought I was crazy. I might have been crazy to expect any support from my union.

    Forgot to Mention:

    The last effort my union took was to arrange a meeting with a director of interior spaces. My union rep was interested in addressing the needs of LGE’s transgender employees and visitors. To my knowledge, there were no transgender employees in my LGE workplace, but it was where LGE’s board met and there were many central administrative offices. By lumping in my concern with transgender concerns, my rep was able to get a meeting.

    There are laws in California requiring private restrooms to accommodate transgender people. There are exceptions for buildings build long before that law’s implementation. LGE was also build before the implementation of the Universal Plumbing Code which requires a certain number of restroom devices (urinals and toilets) per quantity of people (I am not aware of the actual formula). LGE needed four more such devices to be compliant. LGE had to file an UPC exception request each year for the building.

    The Protest:

    The Monday after my board appearance, I left my desk with my pannier and toiletries bag. Instead of entering the toilet stall, I unlocked my bike, loaded it, walked to the spot I picked, activated my Fly-6 taillight/camera and commenced to wash my torso and arms. The same technique for washing over a toilet worked for washing on a sidewalk over a gutter.

    I put on my dress shirt, but saved switching out of my gym shorts for upstairs in the toilet stall. Sidewalks are dirtier than stall floors, and there is nowhere to sit should I needed to. I returned and relocked my bicycle, then upstairs to adorn pants in a toilet stall. I put everything away at my desk. I went down to the cafeteria to gather a breakfast, ate at my desk and then attended a meeting.

    My manager greeted me at my desk after the meeting. A police sergeant visited my desk while I was away. It spooked my manager. I explained my idio-protest. He thought it nonsense. The police sergeant left his card and asked my manager to have me call him.

    There were several complaints. I explained to the officer that the purpose of a demonstration is to show that the authority’s position is wrong, or in this case, ridiculous. The sergeant said I should use LGE facilities for my washing. I emailed him the materials I presented to the board. He said he’d get back to me. I continued my protest every day I rode to work. A few days later, the sergeant emailed back. There were no LGE facilities I could use. Duh. Although my demonstration broke no laws, it generated complaints every day. I should reconsider. I thanked the sergeant and informed him that I found washing on the street more pleasant than washing over a toilet.

    A police officer patrolled the sidewalks around LGE every morning. I never gathered support from the cycling community. No news van stopped to interview me, though, on several occasions, they parked less than fifty yards away to cover stories regarding LGE. A homeless person took inspiration from my practice and started washing himself around the corner. And so it went, day after day, week after week.

    I rarely ventured to the second floor. Not much there save a couple conference rooms, a bridge to a parking structure I didn’t use and building management where ID/Access badges are made. Had I visited the south side of the second floor, I would have noticed it blocked off. Some big remodeling project.

    Two months later, my union rep dragged me to the second floor.

    “You did it!” She pointed to a tarped off area.

    “Yeah, right. What?”

    “Do you know what that is?”

    “Asbestos removal?”

    “No, they are building your bathrooms.”

    “Do I get a key?”

    No keys. LGE built four private use bathrooms, two were accessed through the building management office (lucky them), two anyone could access. Neither of the later displayed any plaque of commemoration bearing my name. They were definitely not “my bathrooms.”

    I continued protesting during the two months before the second floor private bathrooms were opened. Several more people congratulated me, and some blamed me. Layoff’s were announced. A few of the building management people told me they were building those bathrooms to get me off the street.

    I tried asking about the bathrooms, but no official information about them could be uncovered. I filed another public information request. The information came a week before they opened.

    Four new “all gender” bathrooms were requested. Total estimated cost: $60,000 or one mid level clerical position. The official reason: To bring LGE up to code.

    Since there is no code for providing cyclists a place to freshen up after riding to work, nor did the California code for “all gender” bathrooms apply (since the building was too old), the applicable code must have been the UPC.

    The most amazing piece of information: The approval date for the four bathroom’s construction was the first day of my idio-protest. Those that knew LGE knew that nothing happens in just one day. The bathrooms must have been in the works for weeks or months

    Result:

    The new bathrooms opened. They were not what I wanted. I wanted access to sinks and counters in bathrooms on whatever floor on which I worked. Well, you can’t always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might achieve an unegotiated workable compromise.

    I justified my protest on the premise that LGE provided no interior place for me to freshen up. Without the premise, I could find no reason to pursue my protest.

    Greta Thunberg was invited to speak before congress. I slipped back from notoriety to obscurity.

  • Words to Run From

    November 26th, 2023

    Opinion:

    “Make me happy.” Seems like a simple, hopeful thing. Here, it is phrased as a command. The request version includes “please” as in “Please, make me happy,” or “make me happy, please.” Whether commanded or requested, the speaker exposes a critical character flaw, he/she can not generate happiness in themselves.

    Perhaps this is why happiness is an attractive characteristic during courtship. Even causeless (sometimes clueless) rebels upset with their society or the world in general can share happiness’s however contrarian or perverse.

    There may be times lonely people seem attractive. A somber pouting face has appeal, though it may be the allure of availability, a sensuous pout draws of our compassion. We’ve seen it dozen’s of times in the movies. Come to think about it, some of those were conman (or conwoman) movies. These people seem more approachable, or it seems there is a defensive posture which begs breaching.

    Sticking with happy fellows seems the safe play as we approach the late fall and winter holidays. I’ve been the lonely person in the corner. I welcomed intrusions into my train of thoughts. I like sharing stories of the world and joys found traveling through it. Introverted early in life, I learned to breach my own barriers and approach people. Circles of smiling, happy people are oft tiring, so smaller groups and individuals on the periphery tend to be more my speed.

    Dangers arise with discovery. “Make me happy” is a clear warning sign. Not always, but still find an excuse, escape and run to a happy person.

    Also beware of variants.

    “You make me happy.” Co-dependence alert. Includes “Only you make me happy” and “I can’t be happy without you.”

    “S/He makes me happy.” Someone else’s problem. Leave before it becomes yours.

    “[object/substance/activity] makes me happy.” Addiction alert.

    “You don’t make me happy anymore.” A good cue to leave … Run!

    I again tried AI. Here’s what happened.

    Mode: Thoughtful (although convincing produced a similar result)

    Keywords: Thoughts about people who say make me happy

    Article:

    Sure, we all get sad sometimes, and our friends, family and partners often help pull us out of melancholy states. Still, I can not recall making this request or demanding t

    When it comes to the topic of happiness, it is important to acknowledge that true happiness ultimately comes from within ourselves. While others can certainly contribute to our overall well-being and bring joy into our lives, relying solely on someone else to “make us happy” can be a precarious mindset.

    It is understandable that people may express the desire for someone else to make them happy. However, it is crucial to recognize that happiness is a personal journey and responsibility. It is not fair or realistic to place the burden of our happiness solely on another person.

    Instead, we should focus on cultivating our own happiness by engaging in activities and relationships that bring us joy and fulfillment. Taking care of ourselves physically, mentally, and emotionally plays a significant role in our overall well-being.

    That being said, healthy relationships can undoubtedly enhance our happiness. Surrounding ourselves with supportive and positive individuals who uplift us can have a profound impact on our mood and outlook on life. However, it is important to remember that even in these relationships, each person’s individual happiness remains their own responsibility.

    By understanding that we have control over our own emotions and actively working towards creating a fulfilling life for ourselves, we can find true happiness from within while appreciating the positive contributions others may bring along the way.

  • Reviewing Love Deleted

    November 20th, 2023

    Fact (mostly):

    Reedsy Discovery held a webcast about genre bending featuring Paul Indigo’s Love Deleted. The genres involved are near term science fiction (I prefer speculative fiction) and love story.

    The host introduced Jacquelynn Kennedy, the woman who wrote the official review of the book on Reedsy. She went over her review and gushed over the novel. Paul Indigo joined and she interviewed him while hundreds in the audience chat texted questions. Later, Paul answered the questions.

    Paul’s enthusiasm for his book was infectious. He was a great guest. He talked about the emerging science of optogenetics and how much he liked, or was intrigued with, it felt like liked, the Cooper Hall character he invented. While the thank you and goodbye messages flicked by, I resolved to read the book.

    I should have known better. My friend, former colleague and fellow self-published author turned film maker (him not me), Tony Njedeh also awes me when he speaks about his novels. I read some of his works. They were okay but failed to live up to Tony’s enthusiasm. Much the same with Love Deleted.

    Opinion:

    After THE END, Paul asks for Amazon and GoodReads reviews, an easy task for those who loved the book. I didn’t like the book from the first chapter. Cooper comes off as a stupid, thoughtless character who shouldn’t be allowed to drive and proves it by crashing into a tress while talking on her cell phone. There is, of course, a reason for this behavior, but that reason comes several chapters later and seems insufficient cause for such irrational behavior.

    For those unfamiliar with Reedsy Discovery, it is a site that allows authors an ability to get their latest works off to a good start. As an amateur author, it arranges for site approved reviewers to give my book a first review. My novel, Frontal Lobe Override, received a five star review which I think is overgenerous. As a reader, it introduces me to new writers many of which are well worth reading. I am not an official reviewer. You have to submit several reviews to get approved, and my reviews tend to be very critical, so I doubt they would be good for book launches (you’ll see below).

    I bought books discovered on Reedsy and leave my reviews on Amazon.com (I love my Kindle reader app on my tablet). I have left a few positive reviews there. In fact, I grudgingly left a five star review for Grayson Scott’s In the Available Light even though I thought the story telling was deceitful.

    My problem here, or at least one of them, is the other authors weren’t featured. They weren’t given a webcast. They were more like me. Before leaving a critical review, I need to make sure the negative review is not a product of envy, jealousy or any other character fault. I almost titled this blog entry Envy Deleted.

    As I said, Love Deleted received a lot of praise. The reviews on Amazon, even many four and five star reviews, point out at least one fault. For sure, some are friend reviews. Still, I’m feeling better about writing a critical review. I’ll attribute the ones saying it was beautifully written to friend reviews.

    One of the early traits which swayed me against this book was missing quote marks. It seems technical, but at the very least, the author should have hired a proofreader. There is a phenomenon I call “Author’s Eyes.” Author’s know what words come next. Even after letting a long work rest for a couple of months, authors are still in love with their creation. So in love they overlook obvious flaws. They can’t help it.

    I kept my college papers for over twenty years. Five years out, I still knew each one of them. If it weren’t for red marks and margin notes, I’d swear they were perfect. Not much changed after another five years. Packing for another move, I gave one or two a read. They were horrible. Professors showed great restraint with their red ink. Perhaps they were saving some for other students. It gets worse after spending months on a hundred thousand word novel (I am a slow writer).

    There were several other flaws in novel’s style. Some of those could be explained by a narrative style called DeepPOV where narrative voice merges with a character’s voice. Proponents of DeepPOV deliberately leave internal thoughts un-italicized and many other style cues are eliminated. The operative word two sentences ago is ‘a’ which is why it was bolded. DeepPOV comes in either DeepPOV I (first person like) or DeepPOV He/She (third person like). In this novel, the DeepPOV is mostly third person, but it skips from one character to another, point of view slips or violations. I can’t imagine editors would allow this.

    Love Deleted is published by Random Word Media. I googled this. Nothing. Either they are too small to have any SEO (search engine optimization) or this book is really self published. The later is most likely. It best explains the lack of editing and adherence to publishing standards.

    I’m feeling better about my review. I am not far from some other Amazon reviewers, and I can not verify the publisher. Still, glowing reviews on Reedsy Discovery. In part, Reedsy Discovery is a service for new authors. There are some some low star reviews, a product of forthright reviewers, but RD never positions itself as a gatekeeper. They do place standards on reviewers. Perhaps one day I’ll apply myself though I would shoot me down so it would be just an experiment, not fair to Reedsy Discovery. Assuming the reviewer was earnest and chose to promote a story she loved rather than act as an editor, then the gushing review makes sense. Frontal Lobe Override received five stars and I know it has problems that simply can not be fixed.

    I believe my review is earnest and not the product of envy. I am ready to submit my review.

    Not My Cup of Tea

    Paul Indigo launched an author series webcast on Reedsy. It was supposed to be about writing across genre’s, in this case speculative fiction and love story, but it soon became a lovefest for this book. Paul is an engaging guest. Enthusiasm for this book, his writing, was infectious. After the last chat message farewell flicked by, I decided to read this book. It was so highly praised.

    I should have recalled Snap!’s lyrics: This one is real so believe the hype (Don’t believe the hype is a sequel). Solutions to all life’s problems lie in popular music lyrics.

    The introduction of optogenetics and it’s application to the lead character may account for the story’s popularity. Here the book delivers something fresh, mostly unknown and speculative. If you google optogenetics, you will discover that there are human trials underway. It is real, fascinating and troubling. I’m surprised the FDA would approve this technology given its potential for abuse. Oh well, if they didn’t, the Europeans will, not to mention China. In the book, the ethics of tampering with the human mind get a mention, but I felt they were mostly skirted. More books should be written to delve into the possibilities, and human dramas, that could come from it.

    I didn’t like this book from the first chapter. It fell into a common writing evil: It withholds critical information from readers. Withholding information is not a hook; compelling stories are. As I said, it’s common, no reason to stop reading.

    The book centers on Cooper Hall, sound engineer extraordinaire, wife of a musician, mother of college boy, youngest of two sisters. In the webcast, the author said he was intrigued with this character. I don’t see it. For the first three quarters of the book, she is more cold than cool, more hot head than passionate. Early in her teens, she cuts her hair short and prefers to wear cargo pants and tee shirts. After that, she dates, and becomes overly heartbroken when her teenage boyfriend cheats on her. For the next twenty-five years, she seems to be in a state of arrested development.

    Her boyish appearance hints at gender identity issues, but the novel never goes in that direction. There is an attempt to explain it as covering up femininity. Throughout the novel, men are attracted to her, but sitting here in a Starbucks, four women have passed by who exceed Cooper’s physical description, so not buying it. Leaving character discovery up to readers is endemic of good writing. For me, another reason comes to mind. As youths, girls are on a parity with boys. Differences emerge at adolescence, the age when Cooper makes her persona/fashion choice. Although she falls in love, marries and bears a child, something in Copper’s brain prevents her from progressing. After the optogenetic treatment, her femininity slowly blossoms. The problem with this is theory is that all the men attracted to Cooper, including her husband, may have pedophilia issues which are not even mentioned in the novel. Well, that’s my theory; you’ll have to read the book to see for yourself.

    Reviews get the genre wrong. This is a Comedy of Miscommunication. For three quarters of the book, it is a Tragic Comedy-of-Miscommunication, but then builds to a happier ending. The problem is readers must slog through so much fertilizer to get there.

    I do not expect a British writer to adhere to the Chicago Manual of Style, but there must be a British equivalent and it must cover formatting titles of books, movies and songs. I’m sure I’ve seen internal thoughts italicized in British works. Writers, trying to achieve DeepPOV, often ignore style cues in the belief they distract readers from the characters train of thought. DeepPOV comes in two flavors: I, sort of like first person; and He/She, like third person. There is no DeepPOV omniscient. In this novel there are several places employing DeepPOV He/She techniques but switching from one character to another, in the same chapter, without a separator or other indication of POV change. Where I come from, that’s called “head hopping” and is consider a point-of-view violation in any form of third person narration including DeepPOV He/She.

    The constant head hopping is not the worst written decision. This author chose to use excessive repetition for the first three quarters of the novel tapering off in the last quarter though still too much repeating for my taste. Perhaps the repetition is meant to reflect character’s mental states, and at first it may have had that effect. The first time, but it kept repeating to the point of annoyance. Repetition from Cooper as she tried to come to grips with what she saw. After the third time, annoying. Repetition from Harriet, her sister, annoying. More repetition Cooper. Repetition repetition repetition. We get it already. Annoyance. Yeah there’s some variation. It’s pointless annoyance.

    Apologies for the mimicry. If you didn’t like the above paragraph, you may not like this book. When I took TV production classes in college, the professor oft said problems with lighting are not solved by adding more lights. They required redesigning the lighting. It’s hard to believe that editors allowed all this repetition. There is also too many details thrown into the narration. Extraneous detail should have been weeded out.

    While reading, I marked the occasions where quotation marks seemed more left out be error than omitted. I read this on kindle. The Kindle locations are 29, 61, 84, 229, 483, 491, 530, 451, 549. I made a bunch of other notes about other usage problems, but the missing or misuse of quotes should be enough to prompt another proofreading at least in the Kindle edition.

    ** Amazon did not immediately post the review. I have ran afoul of their review guidelines in the past. They will not allow reviews of one thing (the book) to contain promotion of another thing (Reedsy Discovery), so I reworded that section. Quoting rap lyrics was also not a good thing, so deleted. Also gone is the pedophilia speculation. That probably raised red flags.

  • Frontal Lobe Override, Here, Now

    November 17th, 2023

    Thanks to WordPress support, I finally figured out how to post my last novel here on this site. Warning: The novel’s content rating of “mature” is well earned. There are several explicit depictions, and most of the content revolves around sex work and human trafficking. The link is https://karlfandkin.com/frontal-lobe-override/ .

    If you like the novel, please purchase a copy on Amazon.com. Other than here, it is only available on Kindle.

    “So,” you may ask, “why are you giving away your novel here and selling it on amazon?”

    Formatting!

    Kindle’s book format adds a bar at the bottom of tables. I used tables to format transcript like dialog. Transcripts are interspersed with narration and dialog making the bars too distracting. I tried using containers to achieve the same effect, but they were not supported either. In the end, I had to use outdents. Outdents looked fine in Libre Office Writer, but they do not scale well in either Chrome or Kindle.

    There may still be some formatting problems. Feel free to point them out. It feels good to finally have the novel where it formats well. I’ll get back to actual blog entries soon.

  • Bully For You

    November 11th, 2023

    Observation: I’ve been following Trump’s New York civil fraud trial mostly through CNN articles. The plaintiff’s finished their case a couple of days ago. The defense will start soon. Nothing much happened today.

    A few things stood out for me. Trump consistently calls the trial a political witch hunt. He challenges the Judge Engoron and at least one of the judges staff with partisan actions. He has been fined twice for violating gag orders. On the stand, the former president was cautioned several time for giving lengthy, meandering answers to “yes” or “no” questions. CNN characterized much of his testimony as political theater.

    Several CNN analysts thought that Trump’s performance was good campaigning but poor legal defense.

    Analysis: Google “Trump bullying” and pages and pages pop up. The issue was first brought to my attention by a friend at the gym during the 2016 primaries. He said that people who went to school with Donald Trump remembered him as a bully. I have not confirmed the accounts but a PBS report discusses some of it (https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/trump-the-bully-how-childhood-military-school-shaped-the-future-president/). There are many more articles from several sources that school children, inspired by Trump’s behavior, are bullying their classmates, a problem more prevalent where Trump support is high.

    For me, that Trump bullies and intimidates people seems apparent, but I’m more concerned on seeing its impact on the NY fraud case. So, let’s take the assumption for granted.

    The issue is can bullying deflect loss in a high profile court case. At stake is $250M, the right to do business in New York and the Trump brand’s reputation. In theory, judges should have nothing at stake otherwise their impartiality would be impaired. By making the case about politics, Trump put the Judge Engoron’s reputation and legal career at stake. The game was on. In poker terms, Trump made an outsized bet, over reason, but not quite all in, and the judge folded.

    Our legal system gives judges a great tool to maintain its impartiality, contempt of court. Trump started his campaign before trial, letting him establish his position and placing Judge Engoron’s career at risk. He, the judge, tried a gag order. Trump violated the gag order, but incurred a meaningless fine, $5000 or a chip. Trump violated the gag order again and was fined two chips.

    Opinion:

    Were I the judge, I would have played it differently.

    1. Before the first motion, acknowledge that Trump is a political figure in the midst of a political campaign.
    2. Warn that this is a duly brought legal case. In order to maintain impartiality, the court will place any party (plaintiff, defendant, plaintiff’s attorneys, defense attorneys or witnesses) in contempt of court and place them in jail until the party public apologizes and declare the court is politically impartial.
    3. Any second attempt to paint the court as a political instrument by a party will land the party in jail for the duration of the trial isolated from contact with anyone other than their legal team.
    4. In addition, the judge will sue that party for defamation for a sum no less than a billion dollars. The party will have to prove the judge’s political bias in a court of law. The good news for the contemptuous and defamatory party is that once the judge files suit, he must declare a mistrial. Another judge will try this case.

    Sometimes, it’s best to walk away from a table, and a billion dollar case might make the walk a little easier. Taking this course assures victory in the defamation suit. By defending their impartiality at the expense of losing a high profile case, judges prove their impartiality, though it’s doubtful they would get a billion in damages.

    Back to the Analysis:

    The judge is now on his back foot and in a defensive position. Trump will continue to push, forcing concession after concession unless the judge overreacts, at which point, Trump wins.

    Yes, strangely enough, taking a maximum position at first usually wins. After that, it is a struggle. Of course I’m thinking about poker, which I know better that law. I am not now, nor have I ever been a lawyer or attended law school. I do play a lot of online poker tournaments. In this case, I think the strategies are related.

    In just about every online poker tournament I’ve played, one or more players go all-in pre-flop on the first hand. We call them the “crazies” At smart tables, the other players let them steal the blinds. It gives them a small advantage, but even crazies can get lucky.

    If a player continues to bet large, other players mark him (“he” general case) for a trap. The problem is that he already has more chips than the rest of us. In a recent tournament, a crazy went all-in on the first hand. I trapped him on the second hand, but he still had fifteen chips from the previous hands blinds. He then went on a lucky streak tripling and quadrupling up on five consecutive hands. His stack was again larger than mine. I trapped him again, taking him down to a small stack. He lucked out a couple more times and survived ten or twenty more hands before another player took him out. Despite his lucky streak, skilled players still marked him for a trap.

    The crazy poker strategy is similar to social bulling strategies. I’ll stick to the one I’m more familiar with. In poker, large bets put pressure on other players. In casinos you play with real money and you feel losses. Online, you can win some real cash. I have won a few $100 tournaments ($100 is the total pot, winner only gets $25, but it still feels good) against 700-1000 other players. The pressure is similar. The theory is that under pressure, players make poor decisions. Faced with the likelihood of making a bad decision, players fold. If all other players fold, the crazy does not have to reveal their hand, so other players do not know if the large bet was justified. Good players go into information gathering mode. They note the crazies betting patterns. If he returns to normal betting, they unmark him, otherwise, they wait for a decent hand, one they would not usually risk their tournament on, and call the crazy’s bet.

    Even the crazies get lucky. There is always a risk. The higher the stakes, the more likely good players, even the best players, will fold winning hands. That’s how crazies win. That’s how bullies win. It explains Trump’s behavior in court this week.

    Back to poker. Good players rarely risk their entire stack. Even if the board (five cards all players share: a combination of the flop. First three, turn, next, and river, last) leaves no doubt they have the winning hand. The goal in poker is to take other player’s chips. Smart players play it smart, set limits, try to read the other players, gather information and time their own overvalued bets to put undue pressure on players.

    Trump overvalues his hands. Judge Engoron already ruled on the facts. Trump went all in to get (or in this case, save) chips. Some people really are that lucky. A one term president appointing three Supreme Court Justices. Lucky even if you believe one of those was stolen from President Barrack Obama.

    Prediction:

    Judge Engoron seems smart, so it’s likely he’ll play it smart. Smart ain’t everything. He’ll impose a large settlement of $100M, admonish Trump that disclaimers do not cover deliberate lies and declare justice has been served. In other words, Trump wins.

    Trump is involved in three other major cases. I doubt the other judges will view their cases as anything other than legal trials. Trump will likely repeat twisting the legal system. I hope the other judges view their cases more like poker. The should remove the possibility that bullying tactics will weaken their ability to keep the case about law.

    Side note:

    The word Bully has changed over time. The earliest meaning in English was “sweetheart.” (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bully). The meaning later changed to something akin to “a good chap” or “a fine chap,” and later to “fine” as in “I feel fine.” From there, bully went on to mean drunk (think of an intoxicated person’s response to the bartender’s inquiry. “I’m fine.”)

    The last meaning is used in the sea shanty Bully in The Alley where bully means drunk, feeling fine and left the alley. It’s the association with drunkenness that leads to the modern usage. Drunks oft become belligerent, and there we go. Bully now refers to someone who, convincingly, threatens violence to get their way.

  • The Universe Seems to be Against Me Today.

    November 6th, 2023

    Opinion:

    Were this fiction, I’d start somewhere in the middle, but, as this is an opinion piece, I’ll start more akin to the beginning.

    I am a bit of a cliché. I am one of those people who sit at Starbucks absorbed in their computers. Most of the time, I play internet backgammon. I need the distraction, and unlikely, unbelievable and unfair opponent dice rolls both help me focus my thoughts (anger, emotions, sense of justice, oh, damn whatever!) and motivate me back to writing.

    I finished editing my friend’s screenplay last night. His raging rebuttals to my notes should arrive late this week. He’s pretty fast. Perhaps this weekend, perhaps next, we’ll sit down over lunch and go through my most egregious notes about some of the weaker parts of the script and start refining the movie. Such is the process of editing.

    This left me time to solve another problem. I want to put the text of my last novel online here on my site so that it can be read as intended. I tried a lot of text formatting to represent transcripts (depositions and TV Shows). Out of habit, I used html tables to line things up. Unfortunately, Kindles azw format adds a table control bar at the bottom of each table. Since I used tables interspersed with narrative text and dialog, this didn’t work. It looked horrible. I tried other html ways to line up the transcripts only to find out Kindle didn’t support them. The book looks good in epub, awful in Kindle. So, for the dozens of people interested in the book, I’d like to put it up in the html that formats nicely.

    I thought South Pasadena would be a good place to work this out. Here’s where the universe comes into play.

    Oh, one more thing. I am experimenting with, for lack of better terminology, the I-Ching lifestyle. The basic concept is to make decisions based on uncontrolled events. So far, those events are, primarily, bus arrivals. There many bus stops served by multiple bus routes. Each one will take you to different destinations. Assign which destination you would go based on the bus. Go with the flow, and hop on the first bus to arrive. Even with scheduled buses, the actual arrival time can vary a few minutes either way, so actual arrival times, while not random, are sufficiently unpredictable to represent the universes ebb and flow. In theory, flowing with the universe is better than fighting against it.

    To get to South Pas this morning, the corner of Fremont and Commonwealth offers two possibilities. Line 258 which would take me to Fair Oaks and Rollin where I could indulge in one of my favorite breakfasts at Hi-Life burgers and from there a twenty minute walk to The Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf where I would investigate how to get my novel onto this Word Press site. Alternately, at the corner of Fremont and Commonwealth, either of the ACT lines take me to Atlantic from where Line 260 takes me to Starbucks on Fair Oaks and Mound. I would grab breakfast there and set up cyber camp.

    I actually timed things for Line 258, but somehow, the bus crossed in front of me while waiting to cross Fremont. Okay, I thought, plan B. I crossed Commonwealth. Little did I know that the bus, to get back on schedule would wait at the bus stop for minutes. It took me awhile and a traffic light cycle to realize this. By the time I approached the bus, a mere fifty feet in front of me, it took off. Oh well, back to plan B. It’s just the universe guiding me.

    Not long after setting up at Starbucks, a jackhammer’s noise interrupted concentration. Oh well, another of the universe’s messages. Stop writing and read some until the jackhammer is done. I had to use the restroom, so I figured I’d switch tasks when I returned. No. Didn’t think things through. The jackhammer was there for good reason, to gain access to external pipes. The restrooms were “Out of Order.”

    Okay, another redirection. Go with the flow. The Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf usually has open tables. What’s another Chai Latte? Five bucks? No. Didn’t think things through. All the tables were occupied. Of course. Starbucks patrons escaping jackhammer interruptions and needing to use the restroom, also occupied.

    Analysis: So what went wrong. I went with the flow. My college degrees are in Philosophy and Film.

    Philosophy is of no help. No amount of inductive or deductive reasoning would have anything to do with interpreting the universe’s intent mostly because there is no rational reason to assume the universe has an intent. The problem might lie in my intent. By choosing to go to South Pas I might have been choosing to swim against natural currents. There were many other options, destinations and activities. I could have chosen to celebrate finishing a task and taken in a movie. So much for philosophy.

    In film terms, this story can be seen as comedy or drama. As a drama, my headstrong decision to go to South Pas was a fatal flaw. No, that’s wrong. Nothing fatal about it. Such picayune consequences indicate a comedy where a comic figure keeps making small mistakes which seem, temporarily, important but add up to almost nothing. It makes me wonder. If a car hit me while trying to catch up with the 258 bus, would that elevate the story to a drama? Can I ever be considered a hero, or just a fool who should have waited on the traffic light? It doesn’t feel like a comedy, but I doubt it would rise to drama. It seems a film degree is little help as well. So much for a college education.

    All the same, I think the universe seemed to be against me today. It doesn’t exist to make my life happier. I should learn to read its currents, ebbs and flows and make better decisions. As I said, I am still learning. I am experimenting with the I-Ching lifestyle. Not every experiment needs to be a success.

  • I Guess an Introduction is in Order

    November 5th, 2023

    Damn, this is going to be a boring post. My fault for starting a blog after dinner. It’s too late too come up with something interesting.

    I’m too old for this. I retired last June. I finished the first draft of my last novel last October. It is off to the editor now. I planned to start a blog then, but my friend wanted me to edit his latest screenplay. I finished that ten minutes ago. I’d like to say that’s why I decided to blog tonight, but no.

    I decided to start a blog back in March when ex-President Trump announced his 2024 run. I wanted to write about it. The title would have been, “A Run for President Should Not be a Run from Justice.” Perhaps the time has past for that post. All the same, it would be weird if one of the first things a newly elected POTUS does is pardon himself from a jail cell. We live in historic times.

    To the introduction part. I am an amateur author. I write under the pseudonym Karl Fandkin, NMRN, and I’d like to preserve some of my anonymity. No great reveals in this introduction. I confess to being a retiree, an Angelino and an unpublished author.

    Now that I’m no longer grabbing at literature’s brass ring of publishing novels, I’d like to write my opinions, observations (facts) and stories I may come up with (fiction). I’ll try to label each appropriately.

    In the future, I plan to get some assistance from AI. I hear RITR is good. Everything posted, however, will be reviewed and fact checked by me. No blaming AI. I will, of course, blame my pseudonym. That’s part of what they are there for.

    This is my first, and, hopefully, most boring post. I am trying to see how things work here at WordPress. I do apologize if you read all the way here.

←Previous Page
1 2 3

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    Fact(mostly), Fiction and Opinion

    Have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

  • Fact(mostly), Fiction and Opinion
    View site in Reader
    Manage subscriptionsSign upLog in
    Report this content
    Collapse this bar