• Frontal Lobe Override

Fact(mostly), Fiction and Opinion

  • Odelay Holmes at Melville’s

    March 26th, 2024

    Fiction:

    “Please fetch me another one, good doctor.”

    There I was, college educated, board certified pathologist and a former professor at the Keck School of Medicine commanded to get tea at Melville’s for a man who only stepped on a college campus to solve the murder of a Palestinian undergraduate last year.

    “You are perfectly capable of ordering your own tea.”

    I met Holmes poking around the morgue at County USC Medical Center when he was still a teenager. The first few times, I shewed him out, but one time I caught him peering up a cadaver’s nostrils. I inquired. His drug overdose conclusion approximated the toxicology report when it arrived an hour later. It turned out, Holmes came to the hospital’s morgue to see for himself how all manner’s of death looked, smelled and I dare say, felt.

    “I’m busy right now.” He fixated on his laptop computer taking up far too much space on our small table. “While you are merely writing notes for something.”

    “Very well.”

    In his formative years, he gathered all sorts of information not only from self initiated studies, but also from direct experience. I still remember a trip to a gun range in Arizona. He and I fired dozens of small arms from P32 to a TAC 50. At this range, I acquired my Smith and Wesson 38 ACP revolver. Have no worries, I trained extensively on its use and obtained a concealed carry permit once I joined Holmes on his investigations.

    “Tall Earl Grey tea latte with two percent milk, please.”

    “Is that all?”

    “No, a packet of brown sugar as well.”

    Holmes detests sugar-in-the-raw. He prefers the brown sugar which only comes with their oatmeal. After a few minutes insistence, the barista relented.

    During negotiations, I noticed a handicapped man with a rollator entered the lobby and looked around. My friend watched his every move. No tables were available, but the man looked intently at every person. Holmes observed him, as he studied table occupants. Since personal computers sat on the several table tops, those tables seemed unlikely to free up. He also noticed several people viewing media on their phones. Earlier, Holmes convinced those people to use their earphones so he could concentrate.

    Previously, I thought Holmes had extreme persuasive powers. He always seemed able to direct other’s actions to suit him. Later, I learned the trick. Holmes used his observations to uncover his opponent’s secrets which he threatened to reveal unless the person did exactly what Holmes desired. Come to think about it, that’s how Holmes recruited me into his adventures.

    Seeing that that no tables were likely empty any time soon, the man wheeled his rollator out and set his course down the street. I waited at the counter for Holmes’s tea.

    “Here you go, Holmes.” I took my seat.

    “Thank you good doctor. Now, will you be so kind as to fetch that disabled man looking for a table?”

    “The man left minutes ago. How should I do that?”

    “With your legs, and a modicom of reasoning.”

    “I’m sure you are better suited for that.”

    “Yes, but there is something I need to do first. Go along Dr. Garcia.”

    This Melville’s was near an intersection of two major boulevards. Our disabled gentleman could have relocated to one of quite a few establishments. Many launderers often wait for their machines to finish their cycles by grabbing a table and a coffee, so I stopped their first. A few quick inquiries provided sufficient evidence to disprove that theory.

    An excellent, but little known, specialty tea shop resided a buildings down Valley Boulevard. It also provides free wifi. Cyber campers, those who set up their portable computers and occupy tables, rarely patronize Kim Chi’s Boba Tea because they do not provide electrical outlets. As expected, the tea house was nearly empty which includes the man Holmes sent me after.

    I crossed Valley and poked my head into several shops. No sign of the man. I overshot Riverside Drive and checked in at the bank. Their ATMs are inside to cut down on muggings. He was not there. I must have checked twenty or so establishments before deciding to confess my failure to Holmes.

    As I headed back to, what must now be a frigid decaf latte, I noticed Holmes leaning against a pole near the bus stop.

    “What are you doing here, Holmes?”

    “Obviously, I’m waiting for you, Juan.”

    “Why would you wait for me at a bus stop when my Impala is parked at Melville’s?”

    “Really, Dr, Garcia? You can be so dense. While you fetched my tea, a disabled man came in, but he couldn’t find a table.”

    “Yes, I saw that, too.”

    “Then you noticed that he scanned each table evaluating the likelihood it would become available in a short amount of time.”

    “That was quite apparent.”

    “Good for you. You also noticed the computer bag strap dangling his under-seat storage compartment.”

    “Sorry, I must have missed that one.”

    “Oh, that explains why you got here so late. Had you made that observation you would have deduced that he’d be on his way to the next available Melville’s. Since many locations have been converted to less amiable configurations, it is likely he’d take a Route 36 bus traveling along Riverside to Mountain which meant he’d head to this very bus stop.” Holmes beamed his I’m-smarter-than-you smile. “What I can’t figure out is what took you so long to get here. I secured a table from the lonely man watching risque videos on his phone and arranged for the young couple to watch over both our table and his while I chased him down before his bus arrived.”

    “Clever actions, my friend. What I don’t understand is why he came to this location when the other location, from my recollection, offer many more tables to choose from?”

    “Simple, Dr. Garcia. This must be his favored location.”

    “I wouldn’t think so.”

    “And why’s that?”

    “Because here he comes right now.”

    “Thanks a lot.” The disabled man parked his rollator against the poll which held a sign marking the Route 36 bus stop. “You made me miss my bus.”

    “Was the table I told you about not to your liking?”

    “Oh, it was a great table. So great that the stuck up bitch and her smug boyfriend pushed it next to theirs so they could have more space.”

    “Then you could have our table.” I made a generous offer.

    “What table is that?”

    “The one in the corner with the window overlooking Riverside Drive.” Holmes answered.

    “Some perv watching girly vids is sitting there.”

    “Then I will inform the manager that he is in violation of their Acceptable Use Policy. The manager will have him removed and you can have the table.”

    “Great plan, Sherlock. He’s the manager’s older brother.” He took out his cell phone and accessed the Transit App.

    “Odelay.” Holmes corrected the man.

    “Orale? What’s up? I’ll tell you what’s up. I was sitting peacefully waiting for a bus that was to come in just one minute. Then you came with this cockamamie story about an available table, and now, I have to wait another fifteen minutes for the next bus.”

    “No. I meant my name is ‘Odelay.’ With a ‘D’.”

    “Who in hell would name anyone ‘Odelay?”

    “It’s a long story.”

    “Save it. You’ve wasted enough of my time today.” He put Airpods in his ears and played music through his cell phone.

    Holmes and I returned to the Melville’s. The manager sat with his brother at our former table. Holmes surmised that the girly vid watcher threw out our beverages since they were nowhere in sight. The young couple found two friends and the four of them discussed moral obligations in modern society. When Holmes joined the conversation, they insisted they did nothing wrong. Holmes persuasive powers failed again. I should conduct a study on attractiveness and self-centered behavior. They quoted several modern and obscure philosophical sources, including former President Donald Trump, to support their position.

    “Forget it Holmes. There’s nothing else you can do here.”

    “Very well, Juan. It’s time we meet Sargent Weaver in Monrovia, anyways.”

    Author’s note:

    Heriberto, a friend and colleague, used the nickname “Eddie” because his name, when pronounced properly, uses a hard “r” which is pronounced more like a “d.” “Orale,” a slang term which roughly translates to “What’s up,” also uses a hard “r.” The English transliteration is “Odelay.” Which is also the title of a Beck album.

    I never wrote my East LA detective novel featuring Odelay Holmes (which sounds like “orale homes”). In the back story, a Scottish immigrant marries a Hispanic East LA resident. While living in East LA, he often heard “orale,” so he used it as his son’s first name. Before his first son’s birth, he moved his family to Mid-Wilshire, so the impact of his ignorance was not immediately evident.

  • Unintended Consequences

    March 20th, 2024

    Fiction

    Rally Speech

    “Hello and thank you for coming today. We must stand up to this abomination—”

    “Sit down!” Matt Broader shouted.

    “Go back to Montana!” Winnie Everrs added.

    Christian Cross took a beat to acknowledge his fellow protesters, but in that beat, he wondered why the opposition treated him more civilly than some of those on his side of the abortion debate.

    “This clinic opened this week despite the Supreme Court’s decision rescinding Roe v. Wade—”

    Moderate applause. A good sign.

    “That put our great state’s trigger ban into effect—”

    “You screwed that up!” Harold Dodsworth yelled.

    “YEAH!” A large minority voiced their agreement.

    “I will crisscross the state—”

    “You’ve sure did!” Agatha Bingham yelled. The crowd’s laughter signaled support for her sarcasm.

    “And that’s why we have to be here!” Dodsworth, again. The crowd started resembling an angry mob.

    “I’ll take it from here, Chris.” Manny Fielding, Save-Our-Babies’ co-organizer, shouldered himself in front of the microphone. “Let’s gave thanks to Chris who’s given so much of his time and resources to fight for our unborn children’s right to life.”

    Silence as Chris exited the makeshift platform.

    “The clinic will open in fifteen or so minutes. We are here to discourage …”

    Chris carried his “Save Our Babies” sign to a nearby bus bench. Pat Morgensen, an eighty year old liberal sat on one side and rested her arm on her “Our Bodies Our Choice” sign. He gestured to the open seat. She nodded.

    Long ago, decades perhaps, they both agreed that there was no reason to bring personal animosity into their disagreements, and they disagreed on so many things. Disagreements did not prevent them from kind acts. A pro-life protester once kicked her water bottle out to the street where a car ran over it. He fetched a spare water bottle from his truck. The bottle had “Let The Unborn Live” printed on it. He found a small paper bag and put the bottle in it. When she saw the logo, she furrowed her brow as if to say, ‘How dare you?’ He shrugged his shoulders to reply, ‘What? You expect me to have a Pro-Choice bottle?’

    Despite the tension in their disputes, he felt comfortable sitting next to her. Just two seasoned champions taking a pause before rejoining their struggles. A news photographer asked them demonstrate a little. They looked at the photographer, then at each other. Snap. They chuckled.

    Chris returned to his thoughts. He wondered how things had got to this point. Why are so many young conservatives like, Dodsworth, Boarder and Bingham, so disrespectful to him, and frankly to so many people? When did his beloved Republican policies degenerate to uncivil treatment of fellow Americans? How did he get here?

    Humble Origins

    Jose Baptiste de la Cruz seemed born to put things together. At the age of three, he stacked his toys into a replica of the Bicardi Building. His mother scraped together as many stray LEGO bricks as she could. Jose constructed every building showed him on walks or in photographs. When he was five, he gathered driftwood and scrap lumber which he cobbled into chairs and tables to help his mother pay bills.

    After his twelfth birthday, revolution took Jose’s mother from him. He returned from his scavenges and found her bed soaked in blood. He remembered little from his brief period of mourning.

    “Soldiers gave you life, sabrino; soldiers took hers,” Aunt Yari consoled.

    “Not soldiers.” Uncle Ismel stomped his foot. “Damned revolutionaries.”

    Jose figured he’d have time to grieve later. He salvaged wood from the house and shed and built a boat. He spent the next day selling most of his possessions for food, a lawnmower and petrol. He converted the lawnmower engine into a makeshift outboard motor, and he crafted a few paddles just in case.

    Florida was, roughly, north of his village. At night, he navigated by the north star. He guided his boat a little to the left. If he missed Florida to the right, he would die in the Atlantic, but if he missed to the left, he would still hit America. During the day, the morning sun was to his right, the afternoon sun to his left. His grandfather’s pocket watch helped him stay on course.

    Jose didn’t know lawnmower engines were not designed to run continuously. He routed the fuel line too close. On the second day, the overheated engine caught fire and threatened to consume the entire boat. He sacrificed a paddle to lever it off.

    Navigating while paddling proved difficult. He veered further left than he thought and landed in Alabama. Three days later, Hurricane Florence swept through damaging several buildings. Jose went to work fixing up houses and other structures. One of the contractors took note of his ingenuity and said he had work for him in Louisiana.

    Jose kept finding work and moved from state to state. He bought a beat-up F-100 pickup truck and followed work which generally led him north. Near Billings Montana, he met Maggie Schmidt at a church event.

    Maggie Schmidt considered herself average, or so she told Jose. She wished for only a few things in life: to serve God as taught by her church, to be fruitful and to raise her offspring to be Jesus loving Catholics.

    Jose spent his last dollar buying a small lot and building Maggie a house just outside of town. Despite her parents objections and admonishments, they married a month later. Before their first anniversary, Maggie bore Jose a son. He wanted to name his child Jesus, but Maggie convinced him Christian would be a better choice. Since Jose provided the surname, Jose agreed to Maggie’s choices for the other two. Christian Mark de la Cruz was baptized a month later.

    Transformative Years

    Jose got to celebrate Christian’s first birthday, but a construction crane accident prevented him from Christian’s second.

    The I beam suspended by the crane crashed into the administrative trailer killing Chris, a bookkeeper and the site manager.

    Maggie’s parents refused to take her back in with her half Cuban son. Christian’s skin color seemed more than pale enough for him to be accepted as white, but her parents feared it would resemble his father’s as the child matured.

    Desperate, Maggie took the bookkeeper job at the construction site. The new site manager, Robert Cross, arrived a week later towing a battered admin trailer behind his Chevrolet 3100 pickup truck.

    The first weeks were rough. Maggie cried at her desk after Robert fired her for incompetency. A carpentry supervisor set him straight, and Robert rescinded her dismissal, but required her to work extra hours as there was much needed to get the project back on track.

    Church members watched Chris during the day. On work evenings, they brought him to his mother along with her dinner. A few included extra portions for Robert.

    “Thank you very much,” he thanked Mrs. Jenson before taking his meal into his office.

    Maggie asked Glenda Jenson to pray with her, and they prayed. Robert shut the door. Later, after a few more meals were delivered, Maggie asked why he did not join them in prayer to give thanks to The Lord for His gracious bounty.

    “Bounty comes from hard work, and I don’t have time for this.” Robert returned to his office.

    Robert and Maggie became an effective team. Robert showed the same ingenuity and resourcefulness Jose had. He laid out the work making efficient use of materials and men. Well, almost, he treated the men like cogs, and they resented it. Maggie smoothed ruffled feathers and explained Robert’s reasons for doing things in particular ways.

    “Why do you coddle them like that?”

    “Treat a man like a mule, and they’ll become as stubborn as mules and twice as hard to move”

    “Hmmm.”

    In the mornings, Robert went over the day’s work plans before going out to check on something or another. Maggie relayed work assignments with crew chiefs and supervisors. After settling the books, Maggie began walking around the construction site. She checked up on the assignments, answered questions as best she could, relayed the questions she could not answer to Robert, and got to know several of tradesmen working at the site.

    Even after the chaos subsided, Maggie and Robert still ate dinners together. Robert would take Maggie and Chris out to the local diner or Maggie would leave the site an hour early and prepare dinner at home.

    As community sympathy to the widow waned, Maggie started bring Chris to work with her. Sometimes, Robert would watch over him. On one return from walking the site, she walked in on Robert showing Chris how LEGO bricks click together. Chris watched in fascination and held a couple bricks in his hands. Maggie recalled Jose’s plans to teach Chris how to build things. The LEGOs were one of the few things he brought from Cuba. Here was Robert filling in for her late husband. It was too soon. Chris was more likely to swallow one of the bricks than to snap two of them together.

    When Robert first arrived, he slept on a cot in his office. After a dinner at Maggie’s he seemed too tired to drive. Maggie let him sleep on the sofa and made him breakfast in the morning. Robert slept well and expressed a desire for better sleeping arrangements. Maggie moved Chris into her room and charged Robert a modest rent.

    Maggie liked the way Robert played with Chris. He crafted wooden versions of common tools like a hammers, pliers, wrenches, screw drivers and a ruler. He also helped Chris make LEGO bridges resembling the one at the construction site.

    A few months later, Robert estimated the bridge project would soon be complete. Though business in Billings was robust, she could not find a bookkeeping job. She could become a bank teller with some training or a waitress at the diner. Neither place would let her bring Chris to work, so there would be additional expenses. She expressed her concerns to Robert who asked if she would like come with him to Bozeman for his next project.

    Maggie sold her house and bought an Airstream travel trailer and a camper shell for the Ford. Father Carlson married them before they left town.

    Maggie bore Robert two daughters, Danielle and Noreen, and a son, Paul. They settled into a home in Helena where Robert ran his own construction company. Robert never adopted Chris, but he treated him like a son in every respect. He also taught everything he knew about construction.

    In the 1960’s, Robert switched his political alliance from Democrat to Republican. He couldn’t believe the party of Lincoln better represented his interests, but the other party seemed intent on coddling to blacks, Mexican’s and unions. “Have enough trouble with those types at work. Can’t see giving my hard earned money to those who want to make my life harder.” On other occasions, he exclaimed, “if we have to have a government, it should work to protect what we’ve built.” Robert never explained that statement. Chris thought he meant the things he constructed like roads, bridges and office buildings. Maggie knew him better. She thought he meant his company. After several hospital bed conversations, Paul believed Robert was more concerned about the Bill of Rights and individual liberties. By that time, Robert ceased identifying as a Republican, preferring Libertarians.

    In the 1960’s and 70’s, Maggie read about the exploits of Catholic priests in New York and Pennsylvania. They supported several activists and are rumored to have participated in the burglary of an FBI office and the dissemination of several damning documents. Maggie scrimped, saved and gave some of Robert’s hard earned money to liberal causes. She drew the line, however, at women’s groups who supported abortion rights. She remained steadfast on Catholic teachings.

    After his eighteenth birthday, Maggie wanted Chris to stay at home, but Chris wanted to be like Robert: strong, fiercely independent and proven capable of tackling the world with his skills, wit and belief in himself.

    Unlike Robert, who never believed in much in God or church, Chris remained a devout Catholic. He attended Sunday Mass, all days of obligation and prayed every morning before work. He believed God would keep him on the straight and narrow.

    He found work in town because he was well known in the construction industry. He wanted to venture out. Robert gave him a C-10 pickup and his mother gave him the old Airstream. He saw an advertisement for skilled tradesmen, and ventured to Montana City.

    A verbal interview went well until the personnel manager looked at his application. Though he pointed out three misspelled words, Chris knew his surname cost him the job. The same thing happened in Missoula where Chris made sure no words were misspelled. In Billings, his surname added to his hirability as a couple supervisors remembered his father. Once he started working, his knowledge and skills garnered approval. He was a chip off his father’s shoulder but with added construction business savvy from his step-father. He worked three housing projects there.

    Before he left, he legally changed his name to Cross.

    “Virtually the same,” the court clerk commented.

    Chris wrote home and explained his name change. His mother said Robert understood, but they both wanted him to remember his real father.

    Chris worked hard for five years. He found working for oil companies in Wyoming lucrative. After consulting with Robert, Chris started his own construction company. As a subcontractor, Chris anticipated huge returns, but, almost immediately, his company fell behind.

    While Robert, and even his mother, always enjoyed their worker’s respect. Chris’s first crew said “yes” to his face, but tasks weren’t finished on time or at all. He checked his employee’s references, and they all attested to competence and work ethic.

    “They’re testing you, seeing what kind of man you are.” Robert related some of his first experiences as a manager and company owner. “I fired three my first week. Then I was fired. I couldn’t replace them. My deliverables fell way behind. I tried doing the work myself, but then I fell behind in my reports.”

    “What should I do?”

    “Tell you what. I’m going to send you some of my guys. You can use them for a while to stabilize your crew, but don’t fire anyone right away.”

    “Why not? I know your guys. They’re best.”

    “Yeah, I made them that way, but they have lives here in Montana. If any want to stay with, fine. But here’s the thing. They’ll get to know your guys. They’ll find out what’s happening, and they’ll tell you what you need to do.”

    “Who’s payroll will they on?”

    “Yours, of course.”

    “I don’t know if I can afford that right now. I’m just starting out.”

    “I’ll float you any loan you need. This may be the most valuable business lesson of your life.”

    “Thanks, dad.”

    “It’s okay, Chris. I want to see you succeed. Tell you what, I send you Sturges. You remember Sturges. You worked with him once or twice.”

    “He taught me welding.”

    “Yeah, that’s right. You listen to Sturges. He wont steer you wrong.”

    A week later, Nile Compton, Leonard Sturges and five other of his father’s crew showed up for work. They came from different disciplines: Carpentry, masonry, heavy machine operators and welding. Two days later, Sturges took Chris out for dinner.

    “Well?”

    “They respect your knowledge, but they don’t respect you.”

    “What?”

    “They call you Robot behind your back and they call themselves your drones.”

    “My lazy drones. I –”

    “– have the wrong attitude.” Sturges slapped the table. “Back home, we all knew you were a momma’s … dedicated to your mother, so we didn’t take it out on you. You were also Bob’s boy. Here, they don’t know you, and you didn’t do anything to get to know them.”

    “I interviewed them, I know –”

    “– you know what they are and what they can do for you. Do you know when Ken’s girlfriend left him? How much money Tyler sends home to help his pa? What do you know?”

    “All those other places I worked, I didn’t delve into people’s personal lives.”

    “At most of those places, you were known as Bob’s boy. They made an effort to be nice to you. Here, you need to make an effort to know your crew.”

    “Okay, when I checkup on them, I’ll ask a few personal questions, pal around a little.”

    “They’ll see right through that and call you a phony.”

    “So, what?”

    “Friday night, I’m taking you out to a bar. Your crew will be there. You’ll buy a round or two, you got it. You can talk to them there. Don’t force it. They’ll be talking too, so you mostly have to listen, loosen up and enjoy it.”

    Saturday morning, Chris woke up next to naked, woman whose hair blonde had dark roots. Hungover and unfamiliar with these situations, he was unsure about what to do. He tried draping his free arm over her. She rolled away and snorted like a slumbering sow. He rolled to his side of the bed, gathered his clothes and dressed in the living room.

    Monday morning, several members of Chris’s crew slapped his back, gave thanks for the drinks and two inquired about girl with whom he left. A third chuckled in a manner that made Chris think he knew something about the woman Chris did not.

    At Sturges insistence, Chris continued going to the bar Friday nights. He only bought rounds twice more, and he started leaving earlier and earlier.

    In a few weeks, the project was back on track, but paying seven additional workers drained potential profits at an alarming rate. Chris fired two local workers whose productivity lagged behind. He also sent four of his father’s guys back to Montana. They seemed glad to be headed home. Sturges said he liked Wyoming, so he stayed on, and Chris was glad to have him even though his wages weighed the project down. Sturges took over supervision, and Chris started looking for the next project.

    Two months later, Maureen Wilkins showed up at the work site looking for the company boss. Sturges escorted her to the admin trailer while Chris’s local workers sniggered.

    “Boss, this young lady is here to see you.”

    “Miss.” Chris recognized her. “This is a busy and dangerous, place. Can we meet at my office downtown?”

    “Looks just as dangerous as a bar or bedroom to me.”

    “Sounds like personal business.” Sturges headed for the exit.

    “What do you mean? You were sleeping. I didn’t want to wake you.”

    “You shouldn’t go back to the same bar, you know. Folk get to know you.”

    “I only saw you that one night.”

    “A lot can happen in one night.”

    “You didn’t fall in love with me?”

    “Love, no, but I’m carrying your baby.”

    “Are you sure?”

    “Doctor said so last week.”

    “So, we should get married?”

    “I want to get an abortion.” Maureen took a paper from her bag. “I worked out how much it’ll cost ya’.”

    “Abortion is immoral. I’m not going to pay for it.”

    “You’re gonna pay no matter what. I don’t want to have a baby, but if I have this one, you’ll have to pay the child support, and it costs a lot to raise a kid.”

    “If I’m going to pay for a child I might as well marry you.”

    “Look, you don’t want to marry me. I’m not that type of gal. Trust me.”

    “Trust you?”

    “I like bars. I like to dance. I like fun. You don’t seem like the kinda of guy I like.”

    Chris took a step forward.

    “I’ll just cheat on you.” Maureen stepped back. “Or get you to beat me or something. We’ll be divorced in a year or two, and you’ll still have to pay the child support.”

    “It’s the right thing to do. I’ll just take that chance.”

    “You’ll lose.” Maureen found the door handle. “Here. I wrote it all down: travel to Denver, hotel room, doctor’s fees, lost wages from work. This covers everything.”

    Maureen held out the paper. Chris crossed his arms over his chest. She let the paper fall to the floor.

    “I know where to find you.” Maureen left.

    “Twenty-five hundred. That’s a lot.” Sturges returned a moment later and picked up Maureen’s paper.

    “I’m not paying it.”

    “Don’t be rash.”

    “I can not … I will not be any part of it.”

    “Have you considered all your options?”

    “No.”

    “Good. We’ll go over it Friday night at the bar.”

    “You and me?”

    “All of us.” Sturges headed out the door.

    However awkward Chris felt recounting his troubles in front of his crew, he understood Sturges’ reasoning for it, or, at least, he thought he did. His crew sympathized with him. Exposing faults made him more human, de-robotized him. Several told stories of similar circumstances.

    “I ran out of town as fast as I could,” Todd Mayfield said, “Spent two years there before returning to Wyoming.”

    “I married the girl,” James Winston offered.

    “How did that end?” Sturges and stared at him.

    “I rather not say.”

    Now the whole crew stared at him.

    “Let’s just say I ended up on the run as well.”

    Most of the other stories ended with abortion payments.

    “We got married after.” Tim Scott said. “We stayed together.”

    “Are you talking about Sheila?” Chris turned to Tim.

    “Yeah.”

    “She’s a good Christian. You both are. You go to church every Sunday and I see you pray every morning before you start work.”

    “All true.”

    “Don’t you think abortion is immoral?”

    “For everything, everything, boss, there is a season. Sheila wasn’t much of a Christian back then. She’s more like this Maureen girl is now, just a little sweater, I guess.” Tim drew knowing nods from the crew. “As I said, we stayed together. I took a while, but she eventually got to know the Lord a little better. Then, she accepted Christ as her savior and salvation. She was baptized, and, then, we got married. Been together ever since. We have three daughters of our own, now. It’s hard. She also works, but we barely pay the bills on time. I … I … sorry, didn’t mean to get into my troubles.”

    “Only one thing wrong with that story.” Marty Spencer set his mug down. “Our Maureen ain’t nothin’ like your Sheila.”

    Heads turned.

    “Last year, my friend Terry found himself in the same boat as you, Chris. Same thing. Doctor says she’s pregnant, paid vacation to Denver. Cost him less, but he don’t own much of anything, let alone his own company.”

    “What happened?”

    “Said he couldn’t pay what she’s asking. Next thing he knew, the sheriff shows up at work. Tells him it’s in his best interests to get a blood test. The next night, Maureen calls him out at the bar. Makes a big stink. A few days later, she shows up at his work with a guy in a suit. Says he’s her lawyer. The guy serves him papers. Terry paid her. More than she first asked. His father had to co-sign for a loan.”

    “You talkin’ about Maureen?” A large man dressed in blue jeans, Coors logo t-shirt and bomber jacket.

    “Yeah. You know her?” Marty answered.

    “She’s my cousin.” He surveyed the group.

    “Sorry.” Marty turned to him. “No disrespect.”

    “You.” He thrust his finger into Chris’s chest. “You must be the one who got her pregnant.”

    “I … I –”

    “That’s right. You better give her what she wants.”

    “Hey bud.” Sturges stepped forward. “You don’t want a fight.”

    “He don’t look like much.” He turned to Sturges. “Neither do you, old man.”

    “There’s a lot more of us.” Tim stood up. “Than there are of you.”

    “I’ve got friends, too.” He pushed Chris’s chest and stepped back. “You know what to do, and if you don’t, my friends and I will come back and teach ya.”

    Three important lessons in two hours. First, bosses don’t have to be superman. It’s better to let your crew see that you are human. Second, the odds are that you are not the first person to encounter a problem. Your crew may already have answers even if they are not the answers you would choose. Third, if you build a strong crew, their collective strength can save you.

    While the crew continued to discuss his Maureen problem, Chris began to appreciate Sturges’s wisdom. Although some of his crew said they’d run from this trouble, he had more to consider, like his fledgling company. They general consensus was that Chris should pay her the money and hope she didn’t come back asking for more.

    They called it a night. At home, Chris struggled with their advice. In his mind, life, all life was sacred, and life began at conception. Babies in the womb needed protection. No one should deny them that. He also saw his company, his goals as babies in the womb. They needed protection as well. At four in the morning, fatigue finally quelled his thoughts, and he drifted off.

    At 5:14 am, his alarm clock sounded and wouldn’t cease until he pressed it’s button. He called Sturges and asked him to run things that day. He slept till noon. Unsure how to take a day off, he improvised a schedule: shower, breakfast, phone calls to three prospective clients, a sandwich, think through his options with Maureen, dinner, more thinking, perhaps watch TV then to bed at a decent hour. Tomorrow he’d be back to normal.

    In the evening, Sturges came by to check on him. The crew made great progress and sent their regards. They discussed upcoming projects. Chris would need more money to startup another worksite. He decided to ask his father for the loan. Sturges talked him into paying-off Maureen as the crew suggested. The notion went against everything Chris believed was right, but he agreed with Sturges, he simply could not succeed with that type of trouble. He added twenty-five hundred dollars to the loan request.

    With a solid crew, Chris’s second project not only made a profit but attracted more oil companies. He and Sturges became business partners and ran two, then five, then scores of projects at a time. He paid off his father’s loan with, unasked for, interest.

    At church, he met and married Helena Walsh and started a family. Leonard Sturges and an occasional plus one often joined the Cross family for dinner Sunday evenings.

    To Chris, Sturges was more than a business partner, he became his mentor. Sturges learned more business from Robert Cross than Chris had. Chris learned more than business from Sturges. He taught him about how politics effects business on both the local level and broader levels. Chris learned to make political contributions to city council members and mayors. His company earned more community improvement contracts and faced less regulations. Chris made contributions to state representatives, state senators and congressional candidates. Sturges also made sure Chris became more active in politics by attending Republican party functions and serving on election committees.

    Chris enjoyed politics. He felt at home in the company of Republicans. They not only understood his business interests, but they shared social values as well. He learned about the socialist Democrats and their wicked agenda to control everyone’s lives. Ronald Reagan led the way when he fired all the PATCO strikers. Sturges taught him that unions were not only corrupt, they also held truly capable men down. Men, all people for that matter, should stand on their own two feet. Their efforts should be compensated for their own worth, not by some labor leader’s formula.

    Chris believed that, in society, the strong, smart and bold should rise to the top like cream. If we had to have government, successful men, like himself, should determine how resources should be allocated. The laws of men should be made by those who proved themselves able to guide men to greater things. As a man who organized, men, materials and tools to build large works not only for oil companies, but for cities, water districts and the great state of Wyoming, Chris felt like he should take on more political leadership roles.

    Sturges succumbed to old age in the 1990’s. Chris completed a business management degree at the University of Wyoming at Casper more out of a desire for credentials than to meet a regulatory requirement. His friends in government made sure no regulations harmed his business which kept prospering.

    On his sixty-fifth birthday, Chris took stock of his life. His children had grown and gave him several grand children. As his business grew, he became more and more the administrative head of his company. He had employees to handle all key aspects of running it. He devoted more time at church.

    His business remained successful, but he no longer looked forward to going to work. He preferred working on political campaigns or organizing support for conservative legislation. When a major company offered to buy his company, he didn’t hesitate. The sale completed in just a couple months.

    With new found time and capital, Chris decided to put his political views in motion. He campaigned for and won a seat in the state’s house of representatives. He campaigned against the new Democrat threat, Barrack Obama’s health care vision.

    Obama care is socialist medicine like they have in Sweden and Canada. A government committee, more like a ‘murder board,’ decides who gets what treatment and who does not. Individuals, not murder boards, should decide what treatments they should get. (Casper Star-Tribune July 4, 2008)

    Chris rode his opposition to Obama care to Wyoming’s House of Representatives. In his first year, he introduced a state constitutional amendment to counter all governmental healthcare mandates. Since Obamacare had not passed, he could not word his amendment specifically, so he had written it as generic as possible. His cosponsor, Jean Mason, a pro-choice conservative, thought the amendment too vague to be meaningful though she like its expression of individual liberty and freedom.

    A handful of Democrats opposed the amendment, but it passed both houses, mostly on party line votes. In the general election, it garnered over seventy percent of the vote and became law in Wyoming.

    Chris thought himself a conservation champion and won re-election with ease, twice. The Obama era came to a close. Wyoming, even more than the rest of the country, divided sharply on political labels, us versus them. Chris participated in this divide. A decade earlier, he enjoyed having a Wyoming bad-ass in the vice presidency during the George W. Bush years. He felt the fight against Obama necessary, a classic clash between what’s right and what’s misguided.

    He didn’t trust Trump. He knew good business, but after binge watching a couple seasons of The Apprentice, he wondered what sort of businessman Trump was. His doubts doubled when he looked into the little actual information there was on the candidates business (every time a Trump company went public, the stock tanked, couldn’t stand up to actual accounting). When several respected billionaires, like Warren Buffet, opposed Trump, Chris decided not to endorse him.

    Clint Duckworth, Republican primary opponent, attacked him on the non-endorsement point. Chris backpedaled which only made him look weak to newly energized Republican voters. Chris tried touting his opposition to Hilary Clinton who, he claimed, tried to impose socialized medicine in the United States during the Clinton administration. He tried to run on his conservative voting record in the state House of Representatives. Nothing worked. Duckworth said it was time to sweep out old politicians and Make America Great Again.

    Chris lost his seat in the primary. He increased his religious devotion and focused on supporting causes that promoted religious rights and opposed legalized abortion.

    After the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe vs. Wade on June 24th 2022, Chris organized a bus trip to Cheyenne to rally in front of Wyoming’s supreme court building. On Sunday the 26th, they chanted, held up signs and celebrated. Within months, the state legislature passed laws to enact the nations first total abortion ban including the use of morning after pills.

    Those laws were challenged citing the state constitution’s thirty-eighth amendment giving all competent adults in Wyoming complete say-so in healthcare decisions. Cross’s amendment now thwarted his own anti-abortion agenda.

    Back At the Clinic

    “The law is a tricky thing,” Chris addressed a group of new recruits, “It’s not as simple as you think it is. Battery boils down to unwanted touching. Anything could be made to look injurious. Think about all those bad NBA foul calls you see on ESPN. There are cameras everywhere, so you can be sure that if anything happens, it will be caught on video and played in court. Just like in the NBA, cameras do not capture the actual contact force, nor do they capture intent.”

    Knowing nods encouraged Chris to continue with his indoctrination.

    “Assault is willful battery. By joining this protest, you already can be seen as willfully and deliberately intervening with another person, so any unwelcome contact against those who think it is legal to murder unborn children can result in criminal prosecution. Here, in Wyoming, you are likely to get a sympathetic jury, but it’s just not worth the risk.”

    Chris scanned the audience. Fewer nods as some of the men seemed more interested in their boots.

    “Sexual harassment is even trickier. You are going to hear different things from different people, but it take it from me, I ran a successful company and I made sure we were never sued for any harassment. Okay? Most of the people on the other side are women. They are a protected class. You throw out sexually charged insults like calling them sluts or whores or even Barbies, and you may find yourself in court facing stiff liabilities.”

    “We can’t call them Barbie? Even if their name is Barbara?”

    “Think how it will play in court. Everyone’s phone also picks up audio. It’s even worse with the women coming for abortions. They are pregnant women. They have even more protection in the eyes—”

    “Who protects the babies?”

    “We are fighting for that in the courts, and that fight depends on what we do here, today. The court needs to see the fundamental immorality of abortion. They need to see it as illegal. It’s not a philosophical issue, it’s an issue that touches us deep in our souls. That’s why they need to see us, here, fighting for the rights of the unborn, fighting for their lives.”

    Mild applause.

    “But we can’t be hooligans. That simply doesn’t play well in court, in the media or, even in person. You need to be careful about your actions. You need to be careful about what you say. Basically, if what you say sounds like you are trying to hurt the women coming here, you are not only subject to liability, you also hurt our cause.”

    “We wouldn’t even have to be here if you weren’t such a political hack.” Matt Broader walked by with his own group chanting “Carry babies, don’t bury babies.”

    “Those are the guys heading to court. It is better to stick to saying positive things. I like to say, ‘I pray for you and your child.” Nothing negative or hurtful there. You have to be careful. Sometimes, even a positive sounding thing can come off as sarcastic and hurtful, like … I don’t know … ‘Hope you are having a great day’ can be seen as harassment. It would be better to say … let’s see … “What a great day for children to play.’ Okay?”

    Chris read impatience in their faces.

    “Righty then. As they say, there’s nothin’ to it but to do it. Pick a good spot and let them know what’s right.”

    Chris fetched his other sign, “Pray for the Unborn,” from his car, found a spot about twenty feet from the clinic entrance. His voice felt strained from his speeches, so he simply prayed.

    Some pro-choice activists formed a human gate in front of the entrance. They could escort the clinic’s clients through the back door. No protesting is allowed in the parking lot. No trespassing signs clearly stated who was allowed on the property and who was not. Every few minutes, sign bearers walked by with no trespassing notices. Some tried to pass out clinic property policy leaflets, but there were no takers.

    Chris knew, like his pro-life side, half of their tactics were for show. The real battle lies in the politics. Even in a conservative state like Wyoming, more than a third of the residents supported abortion rights. Throw in those who were wishy-washy or just didn’t care, and Chris’s side was in the minority. Most politicians prefer to be with the majority. The judges they appoint reflect majority opinions. Chris schemed to sway the those in the middle to take a firm stand against abortion, and he knew the other side targeted their messages at the middle as well.

    Long ago, in the 80’s and 90’s, direct action at abortion clinics swayed women away. Soon, those early protesters met counter protesters who shielded woman away from harsh speech and pictures of bloody fetuses. Tactics changed. Groups like Operation Rescue pushed their way into clinics and disrupted procedures. Now human gates protected access and prevented radical pro-life activists from chaining themselves to the entrance.

    Chris recounted the changes: physical rushes led to assault and battery convictions, shaming clients led to costly sexual harassment settlements, attempts to shut down clinics led to RICO convictions. Chris snorted at the last one. A federal law intended to curb organized crime was used against the likes of Operation Rescue’s more militant tactics. Talk about unintended consequences. Chris wondered how the guy who came up with that felt.

    Today’s opposition tactics seemed clear. Along with the human gate at the entrance. They formed an escort bubble around clinic clients agreeing to enter through the front door. They put noise canceling earphones on the client and surrounded her. The bubble slowly walks to the door. When it makes contact with the human gate, both the gate and bubble open up and the client enters. The human gate closes and the bubble returns to the parking lot.

    Given the infrequency of front door entrants, Chris assumed most of the clinics customers preferred the back door. Chris tries to stay on the right side of the law, but his friend, Milly, followed a Broader group to protest in the parking lot. Before they were declared trespassers, ticketed and taken back to sidewalk, Milly saw a human gate at the rear entrance as well.

    Chris remembered when Milly tried to gain entrance to the clinic by pretending to be pregnant. She was caught by a pre-entry screener who didn’t believe the seventy-two year old woman. Milly then convinced her grandniece to pretend to be a patient. She made it through and handcuffed herself to a row of waiting room seats. The police noticed that the seats came apart and easily removed her. Chris posted her bail, and he convinced parishioners to cover thousands in fines. After three months, her jail time came to an end. She never returned to the protests.

    Harold Dodsworth got a group to form a three deep wall across the sidewalk. Winnie Everrs set up a similar wall on the other side of the door.

    “Ree-coh, ree-coh,” The pro-choice side chanted.

    Chris knew the morning’s protests were coming to an end. Aggressive tactics brought unlawful assembly declarations. Soon the police will order everyone, both sides, to disperse. They could still protest from across the street.

    “Tim.” Chris spotted Sargent Ford of the state police head towards Dodsworth’s group.

    “Mr. Cross.”

    “They’re just standing there. Not doing anything wrong.”

    “You know I’m on your side on this.” Sgt. Ford turned to face Chris. “But I have to do my job. They are deliberately blocking entrance to a legitimate business in an effort to shut that business down. That’s the definition of racketeering.”

    “Tell Harold I tried.”

    “Do you think he’ll care?” Sgt. Ford laughed as he approached Dodsworth.

    “Hey!” Chris felt a clasp on his shoulder.

    “Don’t you remember me?”

    “Paul?” Chris turned and saw his younger brother.

    Reunion

    Paul spread his arms initiating a hug. Chris’s signs proved too much an obstacle. He smiled instead.

    “What brings you here?”

    “Dani, Nora and I haven’t seen you since Dad’s funeral. We thought we’d come by for a little reunion.”

    “Could have called first?”

    “It was a spur of the moment kind of thing.”

    “Where’s Noreen?”

    Paul pointed his nose down the street. Chris followed his gaze. Daniela and Noreen were talking to Pat Morgensen. After a moment, Noreen hugged pat.

    “Oh!” Chris looked away.

    “You gonna be here long?” Paul asked.

    “Well, it’s almost over, except the cross-street shouting.”

    “Good, let me buy you a cup.”

    Paul walked Chris to the Cottage Cafe. The route took them past the clinic. Chris looked, he guessed right; the opposition formed a human gate at the rear door. He also took another glance at his sisters as Pat Morgensen lead them to where pro-choice demonstrators rallied after the disbursement order.

    “Chris, your my older brother, and I love. I always will,” Paul began as they waited for their coffees. “I always looked up to when we were kids. You were so good with your hands.”

    “Thank you Paul.”

    “We haven’t seen much of you, in … God knows how long … decades.”

    “I came home as much as I could. It gets harder after you settle down.”

    “I know, I’m married, too.”

    “How is Helena and the kids?”

    “The kids are grown and have kids of their own.”

    “Yeah—”

    “My wife is recovering from chemo.” Paul took a sip. “Otherwise she would be here, with us today.”

    “How about Nora’s husband?”

    “They divorced awhile ago.”

    “Oh, that’s right. Mom must have been devastated.”

    “She understood the divorce. She didn’t understand all those nights Nora came home bruised and beaten.”

    “Sorry to hear that.”

    “Dani’s wife decided not to come.”

    “I’m glad to hear that—”

    “– because of you.”

    “It’s not my law; it’s God’s law.”

    “Mom didn’t see it that way. She opposed it at first, but she came to believe that God is love. All love reflects God’s love—”

    “Almost all love.”

    “All love.” Paul leaned forward.

    “A pedophile’s love of his prey?” Chris leaned forward and looked his brother in the eye.

    “That’s not love, that’s perversion.”

    Chris raised an eyebrow.

    “You don’t know love from perversion?”

    “I know it’s a sin to cast your seed on the ground.”

    “Sounds like a male only sin.” Paul sat back. “Unless you think menstruation is sin.”

    “I—”

    “Did you call Helena a sinner every month.” Paul laughed. “Wait. Almost every month. You have three children. Still, the math don’t add up here. Does it?”

    “Helena is a good Catholic woman.”

    “Except every month, unless she’s pregnant?”

    “The Holy Bible defines what’s a sin and what’s not.”

    “For every situation?”

    “Yes, for everything?”

    “You can’t believe that.”

    “I surely do.”

    “The Bible has what, a million words. There are eight billion people on the planet. Eight billion sets of uncountable interactions, permutations, unique situations. You believe the Bible accounts for all that.”

    “The constitution only has five thousand words and it covers three hundred million Americans.”

    “But those five thousand words need interpretation, don’t they. The supreme court, alone, must have written over sixty-five millions words to interpret those five thousand. Some of those words reverse previous opinions. Right?”

    “Right, that’s why—”

    “And the Jewish Talmud has some two million words just discussing and refining the old testament.”

    “What’s your point, brother?”

    “That it’s not just what was written thousands of years ago. It’s how it should be interpreted today. With real people. That we know.”

    “You don’t think God, with his omniscience, has thought all that out.”

    “I’ll give you that, but where did he write all that down?”

    “In the Bible.”

    “It’s only a million words. Most of it is stories, poems, parables and secret coded messages that no-one has ever decoded. Are you so sure you can live by scattered excerpts?”

    “I can follow my church.”

    “Doesn’t your church preach that God is love? That your God is a loving god, not a vengeful god?”

    “That is correct.” Father Patrick approached. “Who is knowledgeable friend, Chris?”

    “Father Patrick, this is my brother Paul from Helena.”

    “I see by those signs that you were at the clinic again.”

    “Yes Father, God tells me that I should do everything I can to shut that place down.”

    “You were in construction. Do you still have access to dynamite?”

    “Father?” The brothers chorused.

    “You said everything. I wonder how far you will go.”

    “Everything legal, that is.”

    “So know you think God is concerned with human laws?” Paul laughed.

    “Family.” Chris looked up to Father Patrick.

    “Do you mind if I join you?”

    “Fine with me.” Paul gestured to the chair next to his.

    “Ever wonder why I do not join you every Thursday?” Father Patrick looked at Chris.

    “We could use your support.”

    “God does not guide me to do such things.”

    “Surely you believe life begins at conception, Father?”

    “Yes. That is our teaching. Where are you going with this?”

    “That taking that life is a sin, Father.”

    “Then you should limit your statement to human life.”

    “Why’s that?” Paul asked.

    “I’m a deer hunter, Paul.”

    “And it’s illegal to shoot a doe,” Chris added.

    “It used to be, Chris. Those policies almost caused herd collapse. Not enough bucks. Many game wardens issue permits for a certain number of bucks and a certain number of does in order to maintain healthy herds.”

    “But that means they may also kill innocent babies.”

    “What, my brother, do you think adult does are guilty of?”

    “I, I—”

    “I’m sorry, Paul, it seems like you have something to say.” Father Patrick turned.

    “I don’t believe there are any innocents. At least there are no innocent humans any more. It may be a matter of degrees of guilt, but that could just be splitting hairs.”

    “Really my son, how did you reach such a contrary opinion?”

    “A few decades ago, I went on my first international trip. At the time, terrorists were pulling American’s off cruise liners and airplanes and taxi cabs and shooting them. The news portrayed it as innocent Americans being persecuted.”

    “Yes, I remember those times.”

    “Well, I thought, what if that happened to me? The more I thought about it, the more I realized that, although I was not part of US diplomacy or the military, I’m not really innocent. At the very least, my taxes contribute to American intervention into other countries, and that those interventions may have benefited us, here, but they negatively impacted lives of people, real people, who live there. And those people aren’t wrong to blame me for their brother’s death or their poverty or suffering cruelties from their leaders the US props up. Even if I disagreed with those policies, even protested against them, I’m still part of their problems. So, Father.” Paul took a breath. “From one perspective or another, ain’t none of us innocent.”

    “We believe that those who have not yet made decisions to be wicked are innocents.”

    “Like unborn babies.” Chris tapped his sign.

    “Even though you believe in original sin?” Paul tilted his head to Father Patrick.

    “I’d love to discuss your notions of innocence, but I need to make the church ready for the eleven o’clock, mass.”

    Paul chuckled.

    “No, truly. Not a convenient escape.” Father Patrick pushed his chair back. “You should know that your brother is good man. He contributes to the church and shows his friends and the community many acts of charity.”

    “Is that what you came over to say?”

    “No. I overheard your conversation, and I came over to tell your brother a couple of things.” Father Patrick stood and turned his body to Chris. “I’m just as opposed to abortion as you are. Should a member of my congregation seek counseling, I always advise against the procedure.”

    “See.” Chris beamed to his brother.

    “But, we should acknowledge that others believe differently than we do, and we should respect their beliefs. It is not for us to impose our beliefs on other people. We tried that for a couple centuries, and it led to millions of unnecessary deaths.”

    Paul nodded agreement to Father Patrick.

    “I’m sure you’ll agree, ours is a church of life, not of death.”

    “Yes, Father.”

    “But your brother is right. Ours is a loving church, a forgiving church. We may oppose the acts of others, but we do not sit in judgment. We do not condemn them. We forgive the trespasses of others just we ask they forgive our trespasses. We say those words every mass. I’ve heard your voice among the congregation.”

    “Yes, Father.”

    “I hope you keep them in your heart.”

    “I do.”

    “Good, that’s what I came to say. I’ll keep your family, your whole family, Christian, in my prayers. I hope we can speak again, Paul, but I really must be going. Pardon me.”

    Father Patrick left. Paul and Chris sat silently for a few moments.

    “Dani, Nora and I would like to take you and Helena out to dinner tonight.”

    “What?” Chris rubbed his eyes. “Oh, yeah. Why don’t you come by the house? No, I don’t think Helena is prepared for a large dinner.”

    “We can bring pizzas.”

    “Yes, that will be fine.”

    Paul stood up.

    “Paul, what do you think Mom and Dad would think about all of this?”

    “Mom was always a good Catholic. She would take her priest’s advice.”

    “Yeah.”

    “Dad, I think, would be more complex.” Paul sat back down. “You know, at his death bed, he told me he was proud of you.”

    “He really said that?”

    “Yes. Not only did you run your own company, but you seemed to grasp some of his life lessons. The only thing he regretted was that Leonard Sturges had more influence on you than he should.”

    “Did he ever talk about abortion?”

    “Not at home. He knew how much Mom was against it. But—” Paul leaned in.

    “I don’t know how to say this. He loved Mom. He really did, but Mom wasn’t everything to him. He had several affairs. Some of the women got pregnant, and Dad preferred to pay for abortions more than child support, if you know what I mean.”

    Chris confessed his own experience with an unwanted pregnancy.

    “Seems like you and Dad have even more in common. Just Dad, well, he thought it was his right to choose abortion for his mistresses. I think you would choose to pay for the child’s upbringing if you could.”

    “Yes, I think I made the wrong choice all those years ago. I may not have succeeded in business, though. And I enjoyed most of my career.”

    “You know what made Dad proudest of you?”

    “That, unlike his three natural kids, I followed in his footsteps.”

    “More than you know. He was in the hospital when he heard about your amendment thing. He said you understood individual rights more than the rest of us. He said it’s one thing to stand up for yourself, but it’s better to stop someone from government imposing rules on the rest of us.”

    “I was. Now I’m standing up for the unborn.”

    “By imposing rules on their mothers? Isn’t that like treating women like slaves? Forcing them to serve to please your sense of justice?”

    “I, I never thought of it like that.”

    “Well, I need to find Dani and Nora and tell them about the change in dinner plans.” Paul got up.

    “Don’t worry, I got this.” Chris gestured to the check.

    “Hey, I’m bringing the pizzas.” Paul left the cafe.

    Chris picked up the check and his signs, paid for the coffees at the register and walked to his SUV. He put his signs in the back and started for home. After a few blocks, he made a U turn and headed to church. He snuck into the mass in progress. He did not follow along. He sat there and sought inspiration.

    Three hours later, long after the congregation dispersed, after Father Patrick stopped by to make sure Chris was alright. After his own thoughts quiesced, Chris headed home.

    He put his signs in a corner of the garage and went inside. A rush of grand children surround him. His three adult children sat in the living room talking to his brother and sisters. Six large pizza boxes covered the dinning room table.

    A beaming Helena hugged him and led him to the sofa. Paul stood and shook his hand. Nora followed with hug. Dani remained seated and raised her purse off the floor. Chris spread his arms inviting a hug.

    “I thought you would throw me out of your house.” Dani let go of her purse and rose.

    “We are good Christians here.” Chris took a step closer.

    “I never thought you were a bad Christian.” Dani embraced her elder half-brother.

    Helena brought plates for all of them. Once everyone was settled. Helena asked her in-laws dozens of questions about their lives. Chris’s children joined in and his grand children played outside until sunset, then they sat on pillows and listened. The adults laughed, told stories and even sang with Nora accompanying on the piano.

    After a few hours, Helena and Dani excused themselves to wash the dishes.

    “We should go to Montana,” Helena announced when she returned.

    “We can swing that.” Chris made mental plans. “It’s only five hundred miles to Helena, and there should be some reasonably priced hotels.”

    “Never mind that. Dani says we can stay with her.”

    “Really?”

    “Yeah. Mandy is looking forward to meeting you. But remember, Montana is an abortion rights state, so no protesting, please.”

    “Just a little.” Chris held his index finger and thumb close with his other fingers folded over.

    Helena and her children covered their face with their palms.

    “Mom always quoted Matthew. ‘For if you forgive others their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you, but if you do not forgive others their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.’ So if you you have to–”

    “I promise to leave my protest signs at home.”

    Fact (mostly)

    Actually just author’s notes.

    Despite being a deep-red state with trigger laws against abortion, it is legal in Wyoming due to an Obama era constitutional amendment (see local news paper article https://www.thesheridanpress.com/news/regional-news/amendment-to-stop-obamacare-used-in-case-for-abortion-rights/article_8fa84810-141c-11ed-b332-cb745f9ba3bf.html ). The matter is coming to the state supreme court, so things could change.

    The amendment is not only an example of unintended consequences, but, I believe, it shows a fundamental contradiction in ultra-right philosophy. The right has libertarian tendencies advocating for individual rights such as removing consumer protections to let businesses rip off unsuspecting customers, religious rights to let business owners dictate what medical procedures their employees can afford to have and the occaisional storming of the castle to overthrow election results. They seem against government rules and mandates, except, for women, there is a double standard.

    Since the main actor in Wyoming is Bob Brechtel, I wanted my main character to have an alliterative name. Christian Cross game to mind and I couldn’t shake it even though I thought the name so overt no self respecting parents would give it to their offspring. I created an elaborate backstory to make the name seem reasonable. Should I revise the story, I think I’ll simplify that part and have him born to a single mother. Here’s the thing. When you Google “Christian Cross,” page after page of the religious symbol and adverts come up. I modified the search to include Linkedin and it turns out several people are actually named Christian Cross, even one woman. So the name is much more plausible than I thought.

    I made one of Chris’s siblings gay because Dick Cheney supported his gay daughter’s marriage, but Wyoming’s Representative, Liz Cheney, did not. In 2021, Liz finally admitted that she was wrong on the issue.

    I’m a Californian and I have never even been to Wyoming. I based several aspects of the story on my experiences in California. For example, California’s Assault and Battery laws are much broader than Wyoming’s so that part of Chris’s advice is probably wrong. Also, I set the conversation between Paul and Chris in a place called the Cottage Cafe based on looking at Google maps. I’ve never been there. I have it as a place that has waitstaff, but from the photos, it looks more like a counter based order and pay up-front kind of place.

    Other than the Sheridan Press article, there is little information about Bob Brechtel. He’s a devout Catholic and seems more a Republican partisan hack than a thoughtful man with inflexible beliefs. My Christian Cross character may be more flexible and more sympathetic than the man the story is based on.

    At the writing of this story, the clinic was not yet open, so descriptions of protest and counter-protest tactics come from some of my own experiences and a bit of imagination.

  • The Ballad of Clara and Matt

    February 24th, 2024

    Fiction (mostly)

    Up to now, Clara and Matt enjoyed a perfect life together. It’s not that I’m jealous. I took my shot at Clara back in college the summer Matt stayed in Paris after a semester abroad. Clara was always out of my league. In high school, Matt started on the varsity basketball team starting his sophomore year. He couldn’t dunk, but his smooth jump shot and solid defense earned him the position. He also ran the mile for the track team. He was awarded an athletic scholarship and attended Princeton. He could have attended any Ivy League school on his academic abilities alone.

    Clara and I attended state university where our friendship developed despite my failed romantic overtures. We’ve stayed close. Matt and I even pal around. After I retired, Matt invited me on his bi-weekly poker adventures to Indian casinos (within a hundred mile range) and his annual poker pilgrimage to Las Vegas for the World Series of Poker tournament. My wife, Sarah, hosts them over for dinner every month or so, and she and Clara oft shop for clothing to replace perfectly fine outfits they recently donated.

    So, I was surprised when Clara joined me at Champion’s Coffee last week; it’s where I spend my mornings writing fictionalized reminiscences. Matt’s physical prowess served him well earlier in life, but he pressed it too far and too long. He’s endured several knee injuries and had spinal surgery last year to regain motor control of his right leg. Matt canceled our poker trip last week for a follow up doctor’s appointment. According to Clara, the doctor said his condition is permanent; the surgery did not work. Clara thinks Matt is falling into depression, though he may simply need time to adjust his life to accommodate his disability.

    Clara is at a loss of what to do, the reason for her intrusion into my writing time. She’s considering leaving Matt, but she’s graceful enough to not make it seem like a selfish, ugly proposition. Even in her sixties, she’s an attractive woman capable of trading up.

    It’s not that I’m unsympathetic; I’m not, but Clara knows me. When presented with a problem, I slip into analytic mode. I made a career out of it. Clara never cared about it. Stories of reading business situations, applying research and proposing a successful strategy bores her. Sarah, if not actually interested, always listened attentively and asked a few relevant questions. Clara, on several occasions, yawned. Matt hired me to consult on several of his projects.

    According to standard “guy code,” I should advise her to leave Matt. In theory, a newly available highly attractive woman would either be available to the advisor or free up another highly attractive woman. The theory clearly did not work in college, so I doubt it would work later in life. A critical flaw may be that if you are not the type to draw a highly attractive woman. The number of available highly attractive women is inconsequential. On the other side of the equation, the best answer to the statement, “He’s says he will leave his wife for me,” is “Do you really want to get involved with a man who would leave his wife for another woman?” implying the answer should be “no.”

    I dove into a deeper analysis. In college, I toyed with the notion that games teach valuable life lessons in a simpler, controlled manner. My college freinds played Spades to excess. In four handed spades, two players play against the other two. Better players deploy cards in manner to communicate to their partners what their hand contains and how to best cooperate to win the hand. A valuable lesson in team work, but a more valuable lesson in non-verbal communication through actions. Bi-weekly poker adventures have me considering a contrapositive proposition: life lessons teach valuable lessons on how to play games.

    The Clara conundrum has put another focus on the proposition. Strategies to succeed in complex human interactions are transferable to other complex interactions. In this case, consider poker, relationships and the rules of financial investing.

    Never invest more than you can afford to lose: the first rule of investing, as taught to me by my mentor, Casper James.

    At first look, this rule applies more to poker than to relationships. The only sure winner at poker tables is the house who take a small part of each pot. Life is full of uncertainties, mastering poker helps people learn how to manage those uncertainties. Limiting exposure to acceptable losses, should they occur, allows investors to take emotion out of their calculations. Like investing, money is, should be, the only area of risk. Relationships are more complex. Each relationship is different as each participant may have different risk areas, and many participants seem unable to articulate their vulnerabilities and loss limits. Many are simply unaware, and they enter into relationships with little understanding not only what may happen, but likely consequences.

    Strangely, people count emotion as a primary reason for relationships where investing and poker strive to remove emotion from decision making processes. Basing r4ealationships on emotion is probably a key mistake people make. Limiting risk to acceptable losses is designed to take anxiety, worry and dread. It does not make investors or poker players emotionless. They often feel joy, happiness and even elation. By reducing the potential for negative emotions, this simple rule paves the way for experiencing positive emotions, though of course, investors and poker players may experience little or no emotions.

    Often, in movies and television, characters try to spark emotions, “get you to feel something,” in their partners by inflicting pain or negative emotion. The logical result would be that their partner would shy away from feelings. You’d think a better approach would be to engender joy and positive emotions.

    Many people believe their love is real because it endures hard times. Sarah and I have traversed several rough patches, but we define our relationship by the good times, especially finding joy in challenging situations. Those are the best. Perhaps this investing rule transfers to relationships more than previously thought.

    There’s nothing wrong with a profit: the second rule of investing.

    This one may not be very transferable. In poker, the only time you can take a profit is by winning a hand. In investing, this rule is about cashing out an investment, or exit strategy. Investors leave long term diversified holdings (such as S&P 500 mutual funds) only for important life events. Alright, mostly death or to meet a post retirement goal like buying a sailboat and sailing around the world.

    This rule has more to do with more speculative investing such as buying individual stocks. Several more rules apply to these investments, such as setting goals and limits. Many investors hold stocks in market stalwarts like General Motors, IBM and Microsoft, just as they hold onto indexed mutual funds, but many also speculate on smaller companies with more risk.

    Since long term capital gains tax is lower than normal capital gains tax, some investors set their targets out a year hoping to meet their goal and pay less tax based on a false notion “It’s not what you make; it’s what you keep.” These investors tie up their money into riskier stocks for a year. Often the stock reaches, and even exceeds, its target price months early.

    Although most negative emotions were taken out of investor’s actions with the first rule, greed creeps in. The second rule tells investors not to get greedy. There’s nothing wrong with a profit. Many forces will act on a stock’s price in the remaining months. To lock in the profit, get out of the investment. The old Wall Street saying, “Bulls make money; bears make money; pigs get slaughtered,” comes into play here. It’s good advice.

    Poker players have a similar saying: “You know what beats a pair of aces; any two pair.” In Texas Holdem’ poker, pocket pairs (pocket refers to the two cards dealt to a player) can be very powerful. Many published strategies deal with how to play pocket pairs. With small pairs, limp in (minimal bets) and look for a set (three of a kind) on the flop (the first three communal cards). If the pocket smalls can get through the next round of betting without a large bet, proceed, otherwise fold. This is called slow-playing. Middle pairs can bet a little more aggressively, but they should, also, be slow-played.

    This investment rule applies to large pairs. Most strategists suggest betting large enough to discourage other players from calling. Although this strategy most likely leads to stealing the blinds (taking the small bets each hand mandated by rules), there’s nothing wrong with a profit. Large pairs seem likely to win the hand outright, so many players slow play them hoping to win larger pots. According to an odds website (https://poker.stackexchange.com/questions/1428/pocket-aces-in-9-handed#:~:text=%22Statistics%22%20show%20that%20you%20will,to%20raise%20the%20bets%20high), pocket aces only wins the pot thirty percent of the time at nine handed tables (the most common number of players at the table) poker. That’s a very large risk, so it is better to steal the blinds and take a sure profit.

    I remember the first time a friend complained, “Breaking up is hard to do.” It was my freshman year in college. “Not really,” I replied. “Just think of what you are doing to make your relationship work, and stop doing that.” In retrospect, that’s bad advice. By the time someone considers breaking up, at least one of the participants already stopped working on the relationship. They already got everything they wanted out of it. Unlike poker, relationships do not have hands and rules bringing them to an end.

    Under pressure, remember why you made the investment in the first place: The third rule of investing.

    Like the second rule, this involves exiting investments. Often stock prices decline before reaching targets, and sometimes they never reach the target. Both time and price decline pressure investors to sell at a loss or nominal profit.

    While playing poker, I place a value on the cards dealt to me and adjust their valuation during the next three rounds (flop, turn and river).of common card (the board) revelation and betting To limit overall losses, I try not not to over bet the value of my hand. This leads me to play “tight.” Other players notice that I place limits on my hands and attempt forcing me to fold by placing large bets. They apply pressure. Along with hand valuation, I set a goal: large pair, straight flush, etc.

    I like to play “suited connectors” (the seven and eight of spades for example) hoping that the board gives me a straight or a flush. Sometimes, the flop gives me two pairs, a much better than average hand. Another player may bet very large without an apparent reason (like an ace or king on the board). Since I hoped for a straight or flush, I fold.

    Sarah and I met at a bar on a trivia contest night. I was impressed by the breadth of knowledge. It turns out that both of us desired to travel but did not want to do so alone. We discovered more commonalities and, more important, differences. I wanted to see archaeological significant places like Chichen Itza, Machu Picchu and the Egyptian pyramids. She prefers meandering through museums. Our first trip was to Rome, a win-win destination. Next month, we will visit London with a side trip to Stonehenge. We’ve endured over thirty years of marriage and are adjusting to both of us being retired and home a lot. Along the way, we have engaged in several fights, disappointment in our children and a trial separation, her idea, not mine. I believe, in the end, it’s the things we enjoy together that keeps us together.

    Yesterday, I called Clara with my analysis and told her I planned on writing about it for my blog. She asked that I obfuscate details about her and Matt. Matt canceled our poker adventure and said it may be awhile before he’ll be up to going again.

  • Jefferson Davis for President

    January 19th, 2024

    Disclaimer: I am not now, nor have I ever been a lawyer. I never went to law school. Nor have I read law to a degree that my reading would give me credit in law school. I am just an American with a citizen’s understanding of legal matters.

    Fact:

    Currently, there is a matter before the United States Supreme Court(SCOTUS) regarding Donald Trump’s candidacy for President of the United States (POTUS) and the 14th amendment to the United States Constitution.

    Opinion:

    For me, this all boils down to a single question: Would the 14th amendment allow Jefferson Davis or Robert E. Lee become president in 1872? The obvious, and correct, answer is no. That would be something the authors 14th amendment would not have allowed.

    Discussion (Opinion):

    I’ve seen analysts on CNN cite two reasons: Due process and the text of the amendment does mentions several offices, but not POTUS.

    Due Process:

    Analysts, as reported in the media, have asserted that Trump can not be labeled an insurrectionist because he has not been convicted of insurrection. For example, Brian Mounce, guest columnist, for The Tennessean on December 28, 2023 states:

    Colorado did not hold a jury trial to determine if Trump was an insurrectionist, nor provide the evidence to be used against him. Colorado did not adhere to stringent rules of evidence or procedures. And the burden of proof used against Trump was not beyond a reasonable doubt. Rules matter. Due process matters. (www.tennessean.com/story/opinion/contributors/2023/12/28/colorado-supreme-court-trump-presidential-ballot-constitution-due-process-5th-14th-amendments/72049528007/)

    Similar views have been expressed, a lot, since the Colorado rulings. This seems a bit odd. Couy Griffin, a county commissioner in New Mexico, was removed from office for his participation in the January 6, 2023 attack on the capitol. He was convicted trespassing and acquitted on disorderly conduct. He was not even charged with insurrection or rebellion, but a court ruled the 14th amendment barred him from his county commissioner seat.

    There are several other cases where people lose property for criminal activity without criminal conviction. Forfeiture comes to mind. From the FBI website (www.fbi.gov/investigate/white-collar-crime/asset-forfeiture) we see:

    Civil Judicial Forfeiture: Civil judicial forfeiture is a judicial process that does not require a criminal conviction and is a legal tool that allows law enforcement to seize property that is involved in a crime. Referred to as an in rem (against the property) action, it is an action filed against the property itself, rather than a person. In civil judicial forfeiture, an individual has the right to contest the seizure through trial proceedings. The government then must prove that the property facilitated criminal activity or represents criminal proceeds.

    Due process can simply mean as prescribed by law (as interpreted by courts). Additionally, the law must allow for appeals in a courts of law. In the Colorado case, there was a trial, evidence was presented and a judge made a ruling. Due process achieved. The judges ruling included an interpretation which will be discussed below.

    Apparently, each state has its own election procedures and guidelines. In Maine, an elected official declared Trump ineligible for office. Trump can appeal that decision in Maine’s court. Even though there was no trial, due process is attained.

    Of note: Neither Jefferson Davis nor Robert E. Lee were convicted of insurrection, rebellion. Davis was indicted for treason and spent time in prison awaiting trial.

    Textual Disagreements:

    One way to read Amendment 14 Section 3 is:

    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

    The other is:

    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

    In short, the trial judge in Colorado read it the first way. The section lists specific elected officials and electors (appointed by states), but fails to list POTUS and Vice POTUS. This is a rather narrow reading of the section. The Colorado Supreme Court read it the second way, a very broad way.

    For some reason, again I’m not a lawyer, the Colorado Supreme Court reaffirmed the lower court’s factual finding that Donald Trump engaged in insurrection. That seemed unnecessary.

    To me, the issue before SCOTUS should be which way to read Section 3. The amendment was ratified in July 1868.

    Opinion:

    July 1868 seems too close to election day to mount an effective campaign, so let’s use 1872.

    For me, the answer to the textual issue boils down to the question above. Would the 14th amendment allow Jefferson Davis or Robert E. Lee become president in 1872? I think, that back then, the answer would be NO. That should be the answer now. There is no way the Union would welcome either men, nor any other confederate, as POTUS. I hope SCOTUS sees it the same way.

    I doubt it will. Republicans have a 6-3 majority in the court. Three supreme court Justices are Trump appointees and Clarence Thomas’s wife, Virginia, agreed with the Trump election conspiracy theory. If several actual lawyers pontificating in the media seem inclined to the first reading of Section 3, then there is room for SCOTUS to rule that way. I think it is wrong. Do they really think Jefferson Davis could have run for president in 1872?

    A trickier question goes something like this: If SCOTUS confirms the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision, does that bar Trump from the presidency?

    On one level, it is up to each state to put him on the ballot. I think SCOTUS will find splitting the US into red states and blue states the most expedient course. States will appoint electors and their ballots will be cast in the Electoral College.

    Should Trump be duly elected, can his claim to office be challenged under the 14th amendment? That can be a little trickier. Trump and the Republicans can put laws in place to make that impractical. Who knows, Trump could extend his one day dictatorship and execute anyone who tries.

  • A Somewhat Successful Idio-protest (One person protest)

    December 5th, 2023

    Fact (despite some obfuscation):

    The following includes a factual account of my own experience conduction an idio-protest also known as a one-person protest.

    I am still trying to maintain my anonymity, so let’s call my employer LGE for Local Government Entity, and, as in “you can’t fight city hall,” LGE refers to both the edifice and the those who run it.

    In a previous post about doing two small things a day to make the world a better place, an AI writer brought up Greta Thunberg and her efforts to sway Sweden to adopt The Paris Accords. She skipped school and passed out leaflets. Within a week, other Swedish students and their parents joined her movement. As an idio-protest, her’s was short lived.

    In contrast, my idio-protest lasted four months and never broke any laws.

    Background:

    I had been bicycle commuting for ten years. LGE had no shower facilities save for a cold water OSHA shower for chemical burns, and that shower, as undesirable as it would have been, was off limits. I learned to towel bath in the men’s restroom. All LGE’s restrooms were multi-user so no washing behind locked doors, no privacy from other restroom users.

    Towel Bathing at Work:

    Towel bathing logistics requires a little explanation. First, at my desk I kept a bottle of liquid soap. Trader Joe’s Refresh or Tea Tree Tingle worked the best. Also anti-antiperspirant or deodorant and a hairbrush. I kept back-ups for the soap and deodorant because I drove to work one day a week and timing usage didn’t work so well. I also have a pair of office shoes at my desk.

    Every day, I packed my pannier (2500 cubic inch bag hanging off the bike’s rear rack) with a large towel (bath sheet sized ones I also used on gym days) and my office clothes for the day.

    To a large degree, only my upper body sweated. My hair was often drenched. I wore Buffs folded into sweat bands. They absorbed a great deal of head sweat, and, since they are made of microfiber, they dried completely by the end of work. I only washed my torso and arms before changing into my office clothing.

    I removed my jersey. I usually wore a soccer jersey. Like the Buff, they are made of microfiber and dried completely by the time I put it back on for the ride home. For washing I left on my compression shorts and gym shorts.

    Towel bathing follows, roughly, the same process as washing hands. Wet so soap with spreads better, apply soap, lather, rinse and dry. The difference is that the towel is used in these steps. Think of the towel as four (really just three) sections. Wet one section (I choose the corner with sewn on tags) and wring out excess water. Use this section to wet arm and torso. Sometimes, this has to be done multiple times.

    When finished wetting, wring the towel section as best as possible. Apply soap to the towel and work it in a little. Apply soap to skin using the towel section. Make sure the soap lathers. Lather lifts dirt and sweat from the skin, so lather is important.

    Use the section next to the soap section for rinsing leaving the bottom half of the towel for drying. Wet, wring, remove lather with towel and repeat until clean. This is the longest part. It often takes multiple passes to remove all the lather. Bamboo based towels are the most efficient and take up less space in the pannier, so they might be worth the expense.

    Dry using the, well, dry half of the towel. After drying, use the drying half of the towel to dry up any spillage on the floor and counter; it’s only polite.

    I carry a thick plastic bag. Sketchers shopping bags and Performance Bicycle bags worked the best. Remove my office clothes: a dress shirt, pair of slacks and a belt. Place the towel into the plastic bag and then stow the bag back into the pannier. At this point, I slip off my cycling shoes, slip off my gym shorts leaving on compression shorts, put on my office slacks, apply deodorant, adorn my dress shirt, affix my belt and brush my hair. I pack up my soap, deodorant and brush into their own plastic bag (sorry forgot to mention that before) and depart.

    I brought a hat rack to work. Previously, I usually hung my soggy Buff on the hat rack. I now hang my soccer jersey and gym shorts as well. The towel remains packed away in its plastic bag in the pannier.

    Of note: I wear compression shorts throughout the day. As I said, they are perfectly dry after the ride. They are also make of thick lycra-like material and are completely opaque. This is an important detail.

    More Background:

    LGE moves its personal around for new projects and pointless reorgs. My group expanded for a new project. LGE moved us to an area where we were not welcome. A member of upper management told us to be on our best behavior. Admittedly, our core group enjoyed a reputation for elevated amplitude. My manager and I were famous for engaging in debates which let to wagers which I generally won sparking celebratory boasting. So, I interpreted this to cool down on celebrations and, perhaps, debates. By this time, I’d been towel bathing every morning I rode a bicycle to work for ten years.

    In the past, I received complaints in person. I explained the situation and ask for reasonable alternatives. Absent reasonable alternatives, their complaints ceased. In this new location, someone complained to upper management, namely the LGE Divisional HR Manager.

    Remember the hat rack above. At one time, my cubicle was near his office. The cubicle aisle was too narrow to place my hat rack there. I put it outside my cubicle wall near a disused file cabinet. This was also near the HR office. The Divisional HR manager hung his suit jacket on my hat rack. I removed his jacket, hung it neatly off the disused file cabinet and placed a yellow sticky note informing the owner of the jacket that the hat rack was my personal property and that the owner needs to find another place for his jacket (Honestly, I did not know whose it was).

    The Divisional HR Manager sent the Divisional HR Representative to tell me that his boss wants me to cease hanging my underwear out in public. I pointed out that soccer jerseys and gym shorts do not count as underwear, and, given my cubicle location, I’m willing to discuss reasonable alternatives. He returned an hour later to tell me that HR was going to file charges. I’m not sure of my phrasing, but I was willing to prove HR staff’s mental incompetence if they did. The HR Rep was sorta a friend as he was a hobbyist cyclist and we often discussed bicycle components and riding strategies. He laughed and I thought the matter was resolved. The HR Manager, however, took advantage of his position to remind me he was in charge.

    Informal Notice:

    There was a meeting about our groups behavior, and the matter of towel bathing was brought up. I was on vacation that day, and I only found out the next day.

    My manager drew me aside and told me of the meeting. The director of the area where we were not welcome brought up my cleaning activities in the men’s restroom, and the Divisional HR Manager declared, “That’s public nudity.” According to my manager, his changing from an office shirt to a tee shirt for his walk home also counted as “public nudity.”

    I sent off an email asking for clarification, pointing out inconsistencies in the HR Manager’s reasoning and so on. After several exchanges, the HR position was that the only place inside LGE where I could clean myself after riding a bicycle to work was the enclosed toilet stalls.

    Formal Notice:

    A week before the election in which the LGE endorsed a local ballot proposition urging alternate commuting to relieve traffic on city streets, I was called into the HR Rep’s office. He had been given the case. He handed over a formal memo spelling out restricted rights to office restrooms and included the public nudity accusation. I threatened to expose this as unfair treatment. He reminded me of confidentiality requirements. Talk to a reporter without permission, lose your job. Talk to cycling groups about this, lose your job and so on. He also told me he was in possession of a memo from Legal, and I could be much more trouble than I imagined.

    Analysis and Raction (aka More Background):

    I asked for a copy of the Legal memo. I was told that I needed a union rep for that. In California, almost all public employees who are simply workers and nothing like a political appointees are represented by bargaining units. In my case, a union. I contacted my union rep. Both he and I requested a copy of the legal memo. No memo was produced. After a couple of months, I submitted a public records request. After six weeks, I received a notice that no such records exist. I appealed and asked them to ask the HR Rep who claimed possession of the memo. Public records reported that no such memo ever existed.

    For clarification, all restrooms in question were several floors up in a secured building. More importantly, there were “No Trespassing” signs stenciled on all entrances. By California law, anything not visible from outside “no trespassing” signs is considered private, so whatever I was doing was by no means public. As for the nudity part of the accusation, California’s Indecent Exposure (Penal Code 314 PC) seemed the closest entitled law, and towel bathing did not violate state law, not even close.

    California’s Indecent Exposure law (314 PC) must include a sexual component and only includes intentional exposure of genitalia for sexual gratification. Anyone convicted of Indecent Exposure must register as a sex offender. LGE is allowed to use Sex Offender Registries to deny or terminate employment. So the “public nudity” accusation was very serious.

    Because the State’s Indecent Exposure law is applied very narrowly, many local entities (cities and counties) have their own exposure laws. The county had two, one for parks and beaches. The city also had one as well. In this case, the three local Nudity and Disrobing contained similar verbiage. Actually, most municipalities in California with local ordinances and codes regarding nudity has similar language and are probably copies of some original source. They all list several anatomical parts all of which must be covered to avoid nudity violations. My favorite is “natal cleft” or, in the venacular, plumber’s crack.

    Above, I noted that I wore compression shorts at all times while towel bathing. My compression shorts opaquely covered all listed body parts, so, no nudity in the “public nudity” accusation.

    In California Torts, falsely accusing someone of a crime is defamation per se. I actually knew that at the time. I asked around and discovered that LGE fiercely defends itself in lawsuits. It would cost about $200K to pursue a successful law suit against the HR team and LGE. At the time, I didn’t think I could afford a law suit. I could take out a second mortgage, but the cost of losing would be too high.

    I decided to continue pursuing the issue with union representation. Mistake. The union contract expressly forbids the union from pursuing actions against individuals including abusive HR people. It was clear to me, that this was, in part, the Divisional HR Manager trying to “get me.” Okay, forget trying, he had me, and the best way out would have been a law suit against him. Since he could claim he was acting in an official, or ministerial, capacity, I also had to sue LGE.

    In torts, you have to sue everyone who might have liability. Leave someone out, and everyone who was really liable points their fingers at the left out person or entity. After losing that lawsuit, try suing that person, and he’ll point his finger at the others. Two losses. So, even if you end up suing some of your friends, sue everyone and everything who might be liable. Let the court winnow the defendants down. In fact, when filing a tort, you include Does 1 through (let’s say) 99 just in case discovery uncovers another possible liable party.

    The union process took eighteen months. During that time I had to towel bathe over a toilet. To make matters worse, these were automatic toilets. They flushed over and over again, often as many as thirty times, while I tried to clean myself. Google toilet plume. It’s real and it spreads bacteria all over the restroom.

    At first, I felt nauseated from the experience. My body screamed for calories, but forcing food into me took considerable effort.

    Towel Bathing Over A Toilet:

    Much the same as at a sink. The steps are the same, but there is no faucet. As a cyclist, I own several water bottles. It takes two. I always keep spares since you never know when one will escape the bottle cage in traffic and not be worth the risk of retrieval.

    So I set up two opened water bottles up on the handicap rail leaning against the wall.

    Obviously, put the toilet seat up. Ignore the flush.

    To wet the towel for wetting and rinsing the skin, tuck the dry half of the towel between knees, raise the appropriate section over the toilet with one hand and pick up a water bottle and gently pour water from the bottle so that it would only get on the intended section and spillage falls into the toilet.

    Since I have a weak back, repeating this maneuver twenty or so times often exacerbated back aches.

    The rest of the towel bathing procedure went much the same, save, given how men often over esteem their aim, forget about mopping up spillage that missed the toilet.

    Planning The Protest:

    The confidentiality constraint coupled with an unaffordable lawsuit left very few options.

    The HR Rep believed I had none. He as partially correct. I could file a complaint against him and his manager. The union could have no role in that complaint, so I’d be on my own.

    Car dealers get the better of even knowledgeable customers. It’s their arena. They know their cars, they know how much money they have in them, they know how much it costs per day to keep them on their lots, they know hidden flaws in used cars and even new cars. They take advantage of those who did not already arrange financing for the car including interest first loans, as opposed to simple interest loans.

    Filing complaints was HR’s arena.

    It took a week to come up with a two pronged attack. The first prong, filing a complaint against HR staff, failed. LGE has a policy that if you file a complaint against high enough LGE officers, they are handled by the Equal Opportunity Office (EOO). The Divisional HR Manager retired before my union finally agreed they could do nothing to help. The position was unfilled at the time. The HR Rep was still in place. I filed my complaint for bullying, disrespectful treatment and violation of LGE ethics policy for dishonesty regarding the memo from Legal.

    EOO refused the complaint and sent it to the division head, back into HR’s arena. LGE policy about any bullying claim requires a complete investigation in six weeks. Six weeks later, no investigation. It just so happens, the compliance officer was the same EOO who refused my complaint. After two rounds of urging the EOO to insure compliance, no investigation. HR staff squelched my complaint. So much for policies. I’m thankful this was the lesser part of my plan.

    The major part of my plan involved the actual idio-protest. I was going to move, my towel bathing from toiler stalls to the street in front of LGE.

    Preparation:

    Simply getting yelled at for washing myself in front of LGE before my shift started, i.e. while people rushed to start their shifts in time, would be pointless unless I could explain why I am doing it. Confidentiality restrictions prevented disclosure.

    There was a convenient loophole to the confidentiality restrictions. I could always disclose anything in the public record. I produced a handout including the Formal Notification Memo and my own discourse on it. I took the tack that alternate commuting was in LGE’s interest. Their own endorsement of a proposition supported that position. The two main factors people do not ride bicycles to work are fear of car strikes and not being able to clean up for work. Surprisingly, not being able to ferry a pot luck contributions and social isolation or being labeled a freeloadedr is never cited as a concern. The later observation was excluded from my speech. The Memo’s discouragement of cycling and similar alternate commuting was added as it worked against LGE’s stated position. I finished by saying LGE should not forbid hygienic activities in their restrooms which were perfectly legal on the street in actual public.

    I should never be allowed to speak in public. I completely blew my three minutes before LGE’s board. I stammered, stumbled, yammered, but I did pass several copies of the memo and my intended speech to the assistant for board member distribution, and the secretary took a copy to be included into the record. IT WAS IN THE PUBLIC RECORD. So an un-triumphant success.

    The last preparation was to pick a spot in front of LGE. An advantage to idio-protests is, as long as the lone participant does not obstruct access to anything, they require no permit. I chose a spot about twenty feet from the entrance where I could prop up my bicycle against a tree.

    I used the bicycle to help carry my pannier and hold my other supplies. More importantly, I used the Fly-6 camera mounted under my bike’s saddle to record events.

    I presented my materials to LGE’s board on a Tuesday and waited two days for a response. None. I chickened out on Friday. My union rep thought I was crazy. I might have been crazy to expect any support from my union.

    Forgot to Mention:

    The last effort my union took was to arrange a meeting with a director of interior spaces. My union rep was interested in addressing the needs of LGE’s transgender employees and visitors. To my knowledge, there were no transgender employees in my LGE workplace, but it was where LGE’s board met and there were many central administrative offices. By lumping in my concern with transgender concerns, my rep was able to get a meeting.

    There are laws in California requiring private restrooms to accommodate transgender people. There are exceptions for buildings build long before that law’s implementation. LGE was also build before the implementation of the Universal Plumbing Code which requires a certain number of restroom devices (urinals and toilets) per quantity of people (I am not aware of the actual formula). LGE needed four more such devices to be compliant. LGE had to file an UPC exception request each year for the building.

    The Protest:

    The Monday after my board appearance, I left my desk with my pannier and toiletries bag. Instead of entering the toilet stall, I unlocked my bike, loaded it, walked to the spot I picked, activated my Fly-6 taillight/camera and commenced to wash my torso and arms. The same technique for washing over a toilet worked for washing on a sidewalk over a gutter.

    I put on my dress shirt, but saved switching out of my gym shorts for upstairs in the toilet stall. Sidewalks are dirtier than stall floors, and there is nowhere to sit should I needed to. I returned and relocked my bicycle, then upstairs to adorn pants in a toilet stall. I put everything away at my desk. I went down to the cafeteria to gather a breakfast, ate at my desk and then attended a meeting.

    My manager greeted me at my desk after the meeting. A police sergeant visited my desk while I was away. It spooked my manager. I explained my idio-protest. He thought it nonsense. The police sergeant left his card and asked my manager to have me call him.

    There were several complaints. I explained to the officer that the purpose of a demonstration is to show that the authority’s position is wrong, or in this case, ridiculous. The sergeant said I should use LGE facilities for my washing. I emailed him the materials I presented to the board. He said he’d get back to me. I continued my protest every day I rode to work. A few days later, the sergeant emailed back. There were no LGE facilities I could use. Duh. Although my demonstration broke no laws, it generated complaints every day. I should reconsider. I thanked the sergeant and informed him that I found washing on the street more pleasant than washing over a toilet.

    A police officer patrolled the sidewalks around LGE every morning. I never gathered support from the cycling community. No news van stopped to interview me, though, on several occasions, they parked less than fifty yards away to cover stories regarding LGE. A homeless person took inspiration from my practice and started washing himself around the corner. And so it went, day after day, week after week.

    I rarely ventured to the second floor. Not much there save a couple conference rooms, a bridge to a parking structure I didn’t use and building management where ID/Access badges are made. Had I visited the south side of the second floor, I would have noticed it blocked off. Some big remodeling project.

    Two months later, my union rep dragged me to the second floor.

    “You did it!” She pointed to a tarped off area.

    “Yeah, right. What?”

    “Do you know what that is?”

    “Asbestos removal?”

    “No, they are building your bathrooms.”

    “Do I get a key?”

    No keys. LGE built four private use bathrooms, two were accessed through the building management office (lucky them), two anyone could access. Neither of the later displayed any plaque of commemoration bearing my name. They were definitely not “my bathrooms.”

    I continued protesting during the two months before the second floor private bathrooms were opened. Several more people congratulated me, and some blamed me. Layoff’s were announced. A few of the building management people told me they were building those bathrooms to get me off the street.

    I tried asking about the bathrooms, but no official information about them could be uncovered. I filed another public information request. The information came a week before they opened.

    Four new “all gender” bathrooms were requested. Total estimated cost: $60,000 or one mid level clerical position. The official reason: To bring LGE up to code.

    Since there is no code for providing cyclists a place to freshen up after riding to work, nor did the California code for “all gender” bathrooms apply (since the building was too old), the applicable code must have been the UPC.

    The most amazing piece of information: The approval date for the four bathroom’s construction was the first day of my idio-protest. Those that knew LGE knew that nothing happens in just one day. The bathrooms must have been in the works for weeks or months

    Result:

    The new bathrooms opened. They were not what I wanted. I wanted access to sinks and counters in bathrooms on whatever floor on which I worked. Well, you can’t always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might achieve an unegotiated workable compromise.

    I justified my protest on the premise that LGE provided no interior place for me to freshen up. Without the premise, I could find no reason to pursue my protest.

    Greta Thunberg was invited to speak before congress. I slipped back from notoriety to obscurity.

  • Words to Run From

    November 26th, 2023

    Opinion:

    “Make me happy.” Seems like a simple, hopeful thing. Here, it is phrased as a command. The request version includes “please” as in “Please, make me happy,” or “make me happy, please.” Whether commanded or requested, the speaker exposes a critical character flaw, he/she can not generate happiness in themselves.

    Perhaps this is why happiness is an attractive characteristic during courtship. Even causeless (sometimes clueless) rebels upset with their society or the world in general can share happiness’s however contrarian or perverse.

    There may be times lonely people seem attractive. A somber pouting face has appeal, though it may be the allure of availability, a sensuous pout draws of our compassion. We’ve seen it dozen’s of times in the movies. Come to think about it, some of those were conman (or conwoman) movies. These people seem more approachable, or it seems there is a defensive posture which begs breaching.

    Sticking with happy fellows seems the safe play as we approach the late fall and winter holidays. I’ve been the lonely person in the corner. I welcomed intrusions into my train of thoughts. I like sharing stories of the world and joys found traveling through it. Introverted early in life, I learned to breach my own barriers and approach people. Circles of smiling, happy people are oft tiring, so smaller groups and individuals on the periphery tend to be more my speed.

    Dangers arise with discovery. “Make me happy” is a clear warning sign. Not always, but still find an excuse, escape and run to a happy person.

    Also beware of variants.

    “You make me happy.” Co-dependence alert. Includes “Only you make me happy” and “I can’t be happy without you.”

    “S/He makes me happy.” Someone else’s problem. Leave before it becomes yours.

    “[object/substance/activity] makes me happy.” Addiction alert.

    “You don’t make me happy anymore.” A good cue to leave … Run!

    I again tried AI. Here’s what happened.

    Mode: Thoughtful (although convincing produced a similar result)

    Keywords: Thoughts about people who say make me happy

    Article:

    Sure, we all get sad sometimes, and our friends, family and partners often help pull us out of melancholy states. Still, I can not recall making this request or demanding t

    When it comes to the topic of happiness, it is important to acknowledge that true happiness ultimately comes from within ourselves. While others can certainly contribute to our overall well-being and bring joy into our lives, relying solely on someone else to “make us happy” can be a precarious mindset.

    It is understandable that people may express the desire for someone else to make them happy. However, it is crucial to recognize that happiness is a personal journey and responsibility. It is not fair or realistic to place the burden of our happiness solely on another person.

    Instead, we should focus on cultivating our own happiness by engaging in activities and relationships that bring us joy and fulfillment. Taking care of ourselves physically, mentally, and emotionally plays a significant role in our overall well-being.

    That being said, healthy relationships can undoubtedly enhance our happiness. Surrounding ourselves with supportive and positive individuals who uplift us can have a profound impact on our mood and outlook on life. However, it is important to remember that even in these relationships, each person’s individual happiness remains their own responsibility.

    By understanding that we have control over our own emotions and actively working towards creating a fulfilling life for ourselves, we can find true happiness from within while appreciating the positive contributions others may bring along the way.

  • #TwoSmallThings and Writing with AI

    November 24th, 2023

    This was intended to be an entry about thinking small.

    Decades ago, I caught a colleague, on his break, picking up trash from the sidewalk. He lived in the neighborhood, walked home and picked up a few pieces of trash on his walk back. I asked him about it, and he said the small effort made him feel better about living there.

    Seeing liter all around, made me feel worse about work, so his small action made me feel better as well, probably several more people as well, perhaps hundreds. The more I thought about it, the benefits of small altruistic actions seemed to have a multiplier effect. It has the immediate effect for the actor. It benefits those in the area. It sets positive examples for others who may take advantage of another situation to achieve a small goal which makes things a little better.

    I am prone to theories. A former girlfriend complained I had a theory for everything. I fall short of that depiction, but about a week after observing a colleague pick up trash, I theorized. If everyone went out of their way to do two small things a day, the world would be a much better place to live.

    It’s not just litter. Consider returning stray a shopping cart while walking to the market. If everyone took a cart from the parking lot, used that cart for their shopping and returned the cart to a proper place after use, the store would spend less on cart management and could lower prices. Okay, someone could lose their job, but the ripple effect of that is unknown and may be the subject of another post. The person’s time might be better spent restocking Kiwi-Strawberry Gatorade, a popular item other people seem to like enough to empty the shelf of them by the time I get there, for example.

    If someone is short a dollar or two at the cafeteria checkout line, give it to them. It’s awkward, I know, but it speeds up the line benefiting yourself and everyone behind you. As Ladysmith Black Mambazo sang, “Time, time, time, my brother, time is money,” so the small gesture, multiplied by all the people behind you is a good investment.

    So far, all examples of small actions are reparations of other’s short comings or bad behaviors, and this should be addressed, but there are other small actions to consider. I recently read an article on CNN about the loneliness epidemic in America (https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/24/health/lonely-adults-gallup-poll-wellness/index.html).

    Today, I started a conversation with someone while waiting in line at the supermarket. Actually, he started things off by gesturing me to take cuts due to my disability. I told him that he should keep his place in line. I suffered a disabling injury years ago, but, as much as possible, I’d like to be treated as if I were not disabled. I am trying to maintain my independence as long as possible. He liked the positive attitude. He told me about some of his friends who turn every setback into reasons not to accomplish things in their lives. It turns out he is a former machinist, but he can no longer work in that profession due to a shoulder injury which is why he could not lift twelve packs of sodas from his shopping cart. His turn to checkout came. He finished his transaction and we wished each other a good day.

    I don’t know if the gentleman was lonely, there was only a one in four chance of it, but, at the very least, I encouraged another person to take the time to talk to a stranger, maybe only reinforced it. If everyone engaged strangers, took the time to get know them a little better, we could ease the loneliness epidemic, maybe make loneliness a rare exception. Yeah, there is a dark side to opening ourselves to meeting strangers. We all saw Patch Adams. Still, most people are mostly good; even more fall into the not dangerous category. It’s worth it.

    There are other things you could do. I found a list at https://reflectionsfromaredhead.com/make-the-world-a-better-place/. Okay, looking at the list of fifty suggestions, only twelve would count for me. Some of these are more changing your behavior rather than taking advantage of an opportunity to make the world a little better. I also don’t count not doing a harmful thing as a positive action. That is to say, eliminating a negative behavior is desirable, but not really a positive thing. If you know you are doing something wrong, stop it. If someone tells you you are doing something wrong, give it due consideration. We do not always see our own faults.

    I also do not count good habits as one of the two things you should do each day. I’m glad you pick up after yourself and your dog, show consideration for others, show gratitude to people even if they are only doing their job and so on. In terms of bettering the world, good habits are static. To make the world a better place, extend yourself beyond good habits to reach out to others or correct bad/negative situations with simple actions.

    The article was going to start off with a discussion of big actions versus small actions and go on to discuss solving problems using Ant Colony Optimization Algorithms as a way of offering people guidance on their two things based on local feedback. I was thinking someone who just couldn’t help doing things on a larger scale could set up websites and social media to help coordinate small actions perhaps leading to larger accomplishments. For example, hygiene is a major concern for homeless people. Allowing them into our homes for a quick shower and cleanup may be distasteful, but gathering small contributions for portable showers and toilets and posting availability schedules perhaps offering assistance in watching over their possessions or cleaning up after someone fouled the facilities would be helpful.

    I hoped AI would help write this article, or at least a good portion of it, for me allowing for a quick posting. Here’s what happened.

    Selection Keywords: two small helpful actions a day, Ant colony optimization, making the world better,

    AI Generated Article: In a world filled with big challenges, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed and wonder how one person can make a difference. But the truth is, small actions can add up to create a better world. Just like how an ant colony optimizes its collective efforts, we too can contribute to positive change by taking two small helpful actions each day.

    These small actions may seem insignificant on their own, but when multiplied by millions of people, they have the power to make a significant impact. Whether it’s recycling our waste, reducing our carbon footprint by using public transportation or carpooling, or simply being kind and compassionate towards others, every action counts.

    By consciously making an effort to do these small acts of kindness and sustainability each day, we are actively contributing towards making the world a better place. It’s amazing how such simple gestures can ripple outwards and inspire others to do the same.

    For instance, imagine if everyone committed to picking up at least two pieces of litter every day. The streets would be cleaner and more inviting for all. Or consider the impact of smiling at strangers or offering a helping hand whenever possible – these small gestures can brighten someone’s day and create a sense of community.

    There are countless examples of individuals who have made significant changes through consistent small actions. Greta Thunberg started with her solitary school strike for climate change awareness which eventually sparked global movements. Similarly, many grassroots organizations have been built upon the foundations of individuals taking small but meaningful steps towards creating positive change in their communities.

    So let us remember that while big solutions are important, it is also crucial not to underestimate the power of everyday actions. By committing ourselves to two small helpful actions each day, we become part of a collective effort that has the potential to transform our world for the better – one step at a time.

    Results: Sorta like an eighth grade essay with pedantic overtones. It hit on many key points I wanted. It chose piking up litter, talking to strangers and mentioned ant colony optimization, but only to praise ants not as an organizing principle. I also liked the introduction of comparing big versus small. That was unprompted. Although Greata Thunberg deserves and has received great respect, her actions would not count as a small thing to make the world better. She attempted to change government policy, no small feat. I actually pulled off a somewhat successful idio-protest, but that’s another story (put link here in case I write about it).

    I tried another AI writing service and generated much less impressive results though I did watch the training video, so I’m not sure I set up the task correctly. At the end, you can ask the AI writer for modifications. I asked, “provide references.”

    Response:

    I’m sorry for any confusion, but as an AI model developed by OpenAI, I am unable to provide references or use links in my responses. However, the information provided is based on general knowledge and widely accepted practices for promoting kindness and sustainability. For more detailed information or specific studies, I recommend conducting further research using reliable sources such as academic journals, reputable news outlets, and official websites of environmental organizations.

    Comment: Thanks AI. AI generated writing is smooth and reads well. My objection is hard to explain.

    In high school and college, a friend, a Cal State Long Beach student who rode his bicycle to school and then to part time work at a wine shop. I picked him up in my car; also a cyclist, my car had a bike rack. While waiting for him to get off work, I hung out at the wine shop. The owner took it upon himself to teach me about wine. I decided to specialize on California vintages. He lent me some books. Many of the books ranked wines on technical attributes or rankings, but one book was unabashedly opinionated. It became my guide. Even when I disagreed (he loved Napa Valley wineries and completely missed that Paso Robles vintor Caparone, at the time, pressed their Cabernet Sauvignon from Napa Valley grown grapes), I knew where he stood and could gauge wines I had not yet tasted with fair accuracy.

    My AI generated content lacked character, opinion and grit. They are also abent a sense of real life experience. I read somewhere that AI writers have the ability to mimic styles. I hadn’t found that feature yet. I wonder if they have a setting like Don Rickles and Rodney Dangerfield’s love child grew into an articulate research assistant.

    I was surprised AI articles produced nothing about downsides to altruistic activities. Correcting the effects of someone else’s bad action (picking up trash) might empower them, and even more people, to continue to litter. There are people who simply consider it someone else’s problem. The more people try to make the world better, the more some people feel justified to make it worse.

    AI Experiment Conclusion: Though I feel somewhat happy that flawed human generated content is better than much less flawed, but bland, AI generated content, AI content took a minute while I toiled over this post for hours over the span of three days. My hopes of three or more posts a week have been dashed.

  • Reviewing Love Deleted

    November 20th, 2023

    Fact (mostly):

    Reedsy Discovery held a webcast about genre bending featuring Paul Indigo’s Love Deleted. The genres involved are near term science fiction (I prefer speculative fiction) and love story.

    The host introduced Jacquelynn Kennedy, the woman who wrote the official review of the book on Reedsy. She went over her review and gushed over the novel. Paul Indigo joined and she interviewed him while hundreds in the audience chat texted questions. Later, Paul answered the questions.

    Paul’s enthusiasm for his book was infectious. He was a great guest. He talked about the emerging science of optogenetics and how much he liked, or was intrigued with, it felt like liked, the Cooper Hall character he invented. While the thank you and goodbye messages flicked by, I resolved to read the book.

    I should have known better. My friend, former colleague and fellow self-published author turned film maker (him not me), Tony Njedeh also awes me when he speaks about his novels. I read some of his works. They were okay but failed to live up to Tony’s enthusiasm. Much the same with Love Deleted.

    Opinion:

    After THE END, Paul asks for Amazon and GoodReads reviews, an easy task for those who loved the book. I didn’t like the book from the first chapter. Cooper comes off as a stupid, thoughtless character who shouldn’t be allowed to drive and proves it by crashing into a tress while talking on her cell phone. There is, of course, a reason for this behavior, but that reason comes several chapters later and seems insufficient cause for such irrational behavior.

    For those unfamiliar with Reedsy Discovery, it is a site that allows authors an ability to get their latest works off to a good start. As an amateur author, it arranges for site approved reviewers to give my book a first review. My novel, Frontal Lobe Override, received a five star review which I think is overgenerous. As a reader, it introduces me to new writers many of which are well worth reading. I am not an official reviewer. You have to submit several reviews to get approved, and my reviews tend to be very critical, so I doubt they would be good for book launches (you’ll see below).

    I bought books discovered on Reedsy and leave my reviews on Amazon.com (I love my Kindle reader app on my tablet). I have left a few positive reviews there. In fact, I grudgingly left a five star review for Grayson Scott’s In the Available Light even though I thought the story telling was deceitful.

    My problem here, or at least one of them, is the other authors weren’t featured. They weren’t given a webcast. They were more like me. Before leaving a critical review, I need to make sure the negative review is not a product of envy, jealousy or any other character fault. I almost titled this blog entry Envy Deleted.

    As I said, Love Deleted received a lot of praise. The reviews on Amazon, even many four and five star reviews, point out at least one fault. For sure, some are friend reviews. Still, I’m feeling better about writing a critical review. I’ll attribute the ones saying it was beautifully written to friend reviews.

    One of the early traits which swayed me against this book was missing quote marks. It seems technical, but at the very least, the author should have hired a proofreader. There is a phenomenon I call “Author’s Eyes.” Author’s know what words come next. Even after letting a long work rest for a couple of months, authors are still in love with their creation. So in love they overlook obvious flaws. They can’t help it.

    I kept my college papers for over twenty years. Five years out, I still knew each one of them. If it weren’t for red marks and margin notes, I’d swear they were perfect. Not much changed after another five years. Packing for another move, I gave one or two a read. They were horrible. Professors showed great restraint with their red ink. Perhaps they were saving some for other students. It gets worse after spending months on a hundred thousand word novel (I am a slow writer).

    There were several other flaws in novel’s style. Some of those could be explained by a narrative style called DeepPOV where narrative voice merges with a character’s voice. Proponents of DeepPOV deliberately leave internal thoughts un-italicized and many other style cues are eliminated. The operative word two sentences ago is ‘a’ which is why it was bolded. DeepPOV comes in either DeepPOV I (first person like) or DeepPOV He/She (third person like). In this novel, the DeepPOV is mostly third person, but it skips from one character to another, point of view slips or violations. I can’t imagine editors would allow this.

    Love Deleted is published by Random Word Media. I googled this. Nothing. Either they are too small to have any SEO (search engine optimization) or this book is really self published. The later is most likely. It best explains the lack of editing and adherence to publishing standards.

    I’m feeling better about my review. I am not far from some other Amazon reviewers, and I can not verify the publisher. Still, glowing reviews on Reedsy Discovery. In part, Reedsy Discovery is a service for new authors. There are some some low star reviews, a product of forthright reviewers, but RD never positions itself as a gatekeeper. They do place standards on reviewers. Perhaps one day I’ll apply myself though I would shoot me down so it would be just an experiment, not fair to Reedsy Discovery. Assuming the reviewer was earnest and chose to promote a story she loved rather than act as an editor, then the gushing review makes sense. Frontal Lobe Override received five stars and I know it has problems that simply can not be fixed.

    I believe my review is earnest and not the product of envy. I am ready to submit my review.

    Not My Cup of Tea

    Paul Indigo launched an author series webcast on Reedsy. It was supposed to be about writing across genre’s, in this case speculative fiction and love story, but it soon became a lovefest for this book. Paul is an engaging guest. Enthusiasm for this book, his writing, was infectious. After the last chat message farewell flicked by, I decided to read this book. It was so highly praised.

    I should have recalled Snap!’s lyrics: This one is real so believe the hype (Don’t believe the hype is a sequel). Solutions to all life’s problems lie in popular music lyrics.

    The introduction of optogenetics and it’s application to the lead character may account for the story’s popularity. Here the book delivers something fresh, mostly unknown and speculative. If you google optogenetics, you will discover that there are human trials underway. It is real, fascinating and troubling. I’m surprised the FDA would approve this technology given its potential for abuse. Oh well, if they didn’t, the Europeans will, not to mention China. In the book, the ethics of tampering with the human mind get a mention, but I felt they were mostly skirted. More books should be written to delve into the possibilities, and human dramas, that could come from it.

    I didn’t like this book from the first chapter. It fell into a common writing evil: It withholds critical information from readers. Withholding information is not a hook; compelling stories are. As I said, it’s common, no reason to stop reading.

    The book centers on Cooper Hall, sound engineer extraordinaire, wife of a musician, mother of college boy, youngest of two sisters. In the webcast, the author said he was intrigued with this character. I don’t see it. For the first three quarters of the book, she is more cold than cool, more hot head than passionate. Early in her teens, she cuts her hair short and prefers to wear cargo pants and tee shirts. After that, she dates, and becomes overly heartbroken when her teenage boyfriend cheats on her. For the next twenty-five years, she seems to be in a state of arrested development.

    Her boyish appearance hints at gender identity issues, but the novel never goes in that direction. There is an attempt to explain it as covering up femininity. Throughout the novel, men are attracted to her, but sitting here in a Starbucks, four women have passed by who exceed Cooper’s physical description, so not buying it. Leaving character discovery up to readers is endemic of good writing. For me, another reason comes to mind. As youths, girls are on a parity with boys. Differences emerge at adolescence, the age when Cooper makes her persona/fashion choice. Although she falls in love, marries and bears a child, something in Copper’s brain prevents her from progressing. After the optogenetic treatment, her femininity slowly blossoms. The problem with this is theory is that all the men attracted to Cooper, including her husband, may have pedophilia issues which are not even mentioned in the novel. Well, that’s my theory; you’ll have to read the book to see for yourself.

    Reviews get the genre wrong. This is a Comedy of Miscommunication. For three quarters of the book, it is a Tragic Comedy-of-Miscommunication, but then builds to a happier ending. The problem is readers must slog through so much fertilizer to get there.

    I do not expect a British writer to adhere to the Chicago Manual of Style, but there must be a British equivalent and it must cover formatting titles of books, movies and songs. I’m sure I’ve seen internal thoughts italicized in British works. Writers, trying to achieve DeepPOV, often ignore style cues in the belief they distract readers from the characters train of thought. DeepPOV comes in two flavors: I, sort of like first person; and He/She, like third person. There is no DeepPOV omniscient. In this novel there are several places employing DeepPOV He/She techniques but switching from one character to another, in the same chapter, without a separator or other indication of POV change. Where I come from, that’s called “head hopping” and is consider a point-of-view violation in any form of third person narration including DeepPOV He/She.

    The constant head hopping is not the worst written decision. This author chose to use excessive repetition for the first three quarters of the novel tapering off in the last quarter though still too much repeating for my taste. Perhaps the repetition is meant to reflect character’s mental states, and at first it may have had that effect. The first time, but it kept repeating to the point of annoyance. Repetition from Cooper as she tried to come to grips with what she saw. After the third time, annoying. Repetition from Harriet, her sister, annoying. More repetition Cooper. Repetition repetition repetition. We get it already. Annoyance. Yeah there’s some variation. It’s pointless annoyance.

    Apologies for the mimicry. If you didn’t like the above paragraph, you may not like this book. When I took TV production classes in college, the professor oft said problems with lighting are not solved by adding more lights. They required redesigning the lighting. It’s hard to believe that editors allowed all this repetition. There is also too many details thrown into the narration. Extraneous detail should have been weeded out.

    While reading, I marked the occasions where quotation marks seemed more left out be error than omitted. I read this on kindle. The Kindle locations are 29, 61, 84, 229, 483, 491, 530, 451, 549. I made a bunch of other notes about other usage problems, but the missing or misuse of quotes should be enough to prompt another proofreading at least in the Kindle edition.

    ** Amazon did not immediately post the review. I have ran afoul of their review guidelines in the past. They will not allow reviews of one thing (the book) to contain promotion of another thing (Reedsy Discovery), so I reworded that section. Quoting rap lyrics was also not a good thing, so deleted. Also gone is the pedophilia speculation. That probably raised red flags.

  • Frontal Lobe Override, Here, Now

    November 17th, 2023

    Thanks to WordPress support, I finally figured out how to post my last novel here on this site. Warning: The novel’s content rating of “mature” is well earned. There are several explicit depictions, and most of the content revolves around sex work and human trafficking. The link is https://karlfandkin.com/frontal-lobe-override/ .

    If you like the novel, please purchase a copy on Amazon.com. Other than here, it is only available on Kindle.

    “So,” you may ask, “why are you giving away your novel here and selling it on amazon?”

    Formatting!

    Kindle’s book format adds a bar at the bottom of tables. I used tables to format transcript like dialog. Transcripts are interspersed with narration and dialog making the bars too distracting. I tried using containers to achieve the same effect, but they were not supported either. In the end, I had to use outdents. Outdents looked fine in Libre Office Writer, but they do not scale well in either Chrome or Kindle.

    There may still be some formatting problems. Feel free to point them out. It feels good to finally have the novel where it formats well. I’ll get back to actual blog entries soon.

  • Bully For You

    November 11th, 2023

    Observation: I’ve been following Trump’s New York civil fraud trial mostly through CNN articles. The plaintiff’s finished their case a couple of days ago. The defense will start soon. Nothing much happened today.

    A few things stood out for me. Trump consistently calls the trial a political witch hunt. He challenges the Judge Engoron and at least one of the judges staff with partisan actions. He has been fined twice for violating gag orders. On the stand, the former president was cautioned several time for giving lengthy, meandering answers to “yes” or “no” questions. CNN characterized much of his testimony as political theater.

    Several CNN analysts thought that Trump’s performance was good campaigning but poor legal defense.

    Analysis: Google “Trump bullying” and pages and pages pop up. The issue was first brought to my attention by a friend at the gym during the 2016 primaries. He said that people who went to school with Donald Trump remembered him as a bully. I have not confirmed the accounts but a PBS report discusses some of it (https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/trump-the-bully-how-childhood-military-school-shaped-the-future-president/). There are many more articles from several sources that school children, inspired by Trump’s behavior, are bullying their classmates, a problem more prevalent where Trump support is high.

    For me, that Trump bullies and intimidates people seems apparent, but I’m more concerned on seeing its impact on the NY fraud case. So, let’s take the assumption for granted.

    The issue is can bullying deflect loss in a high profile court case. At stake is $250M, the right to do business in New York and the Trump brand’s reputation. In theory, judges should have nothing at stake otherwise their impartiality would be impaired. By making the case about politics, Trump put the Judge Engoron’s reputation and legal career at stake. The game was on. In poker terms, Trump made an outsized bet, over reason, but not quite all in, and the judge folded.

    Our legal system gives judges a great tool to maintain its impartiality, contempt of court. Trump started his campaign before trial, letting him establish his position and placing Judge Engoron’s career at risk. He, the judge, tried a gag order. Trump violated the gag order, but incurred a meaningless fine, $5000 or a chip. Trump violated the gag order again and was fined two chips.

    Opinion:

    Were I the judge, I would have played it differently.

    1. Before the first motion, acknowledge that Trump is a political figure in the midst of a political campaign.
    2. Warn that this is a duly brought legal case. In order to maintain impartiality, the court will place any party (plaintiff, defendant, plaintiff’s attorneys, defense attorneys or witnesses) in contempt of court and place them in jail until the party public apologizes and declare the court is politically impartial.
    3. Any second attempt to paint the court as a political instrument by a party will land the party in jail for the duration of the trial isolated from contact with anyone other than their legal team.
    4. In addition, the judge will sue that party for defamation for a sum no less than a billion dollars. The party will have to prove the judge’s political bias in a court of law. The good news for the contemptuous and defamatory party is that once the judge files suit, he must declare a mistrial. Another judge will try this case.

    Sometimes, it’s best to walk away from a table, and a billion dollar case might make the walk a little easier. Taking this course assures victory in the defamation suit. By defending their impartiality at the expense of losing a high profile case, judges prove their impartiality, though it’s doubtful they would get a billion in damages.

    Back to the Analysis:

    The judge is now on his back foot and in a defensive position. Trump will continue to push, forcing concession after concession unless the judge overreacts, at which point, Trump wins.

    Yes, strangely enough, taking a maximum position at first usually wins. After that, it is a struggle. Of course I’m thinking about poker, which I know better that law. I am not now, nor have I ever been a lawyer or attended law school. I do play a lot of online poker tournaments. In this case, I think the strategies are related.

    In just about every online poker tournament I’ve played, one or more players go all-in pre-flop on the first hand. We call them the “crazies” At smart tables, the other players let them steal the blinds. It gives them a small advantage, but even crazies can get lucky.

    If a player continues to bet large, other players mark him (“he” general case) for a trap. The problem is that he already has more chips than the rest of us. In a recent tournament, a crazy went all-in on the first hand. I trapped him on the second hand, but he still had fifteen chips from the previous hands blinds. He then went on a lucky streak tripling and quadrupling up on five consecutive hands. His stack was again larger than mine. I trapped him again, taking him down to a small stack. He lucked out a couple more times and survived ten or twenty more hands before another player took him out. Despite his lucky streak, skilled players still marked him for a trap.

    The crazy poker strategy is similar to social bulling strategies. I’ll stick to the one I’m more familiar with. In poker, large bets put pressure on other players. In casinos you play with real money and you feel losses. Online, you can win some real cash. I have won a few $100 tournaments ($100 is the total pot, winner only gets $25, but it still feels good) against 700-1000 other players. The pressure is similar. The theory is that under pressure, players make poor decisions. Faced with the likelihood of making a bad decision, players fold. If all other players fold, the crazy does not have to reveal their hand, so other players do not know if the large bet was justified. Good players go into information gathering mode. They note the crazies betting patterns. If he returns to normal betting, they unmark him, otherwise, they wait for a decent hand, one they would not usually risk their tournament on, and call the crazy’s bet.

    Even the crazies get lucky. There is always a risk. The higher the stakes, the more likely good players, even the best players, will fold winning hands. That’s how crazies win. That’s how bullies win. It explains Trump’s behavior in court this week.

    Back to poker. Good players rarely risk their entire stack. Even if the board (five cards all players share: a combination of the flop. First three, turn, next, and river, last) leaves no doubt they have the winning hand. The goal in poker is to take other player’s chips. Smart players play it smart, set limits, try to read the other players, gather information and time their own overvalued bets to put undue pressure on players.

    Trump overvalues his hands. Judge Engoron already ruled on the facts. Trump went all in to get (or in this case, save) chips. Some people really are that lucky. A one term president appointing three Supreme Court Justices. Lucky even if you believe one of those was stolen from President Barrack Obama.

    Prediction:

    Judge Engoron seems smart, so it’s likely he’ll play it smart. Smart ain’t everything. He’ll impose a large settlement of $100M, admonish Trump that disclaimers do not cover deliberate lies and declare justice has been served. In other words, Trump wins.

    Trump is involved in three other major cases. I doubt the other judges will view their cases as anything other than legal trials. Trump will likely repeat twisting the legal system. I hope the other judges view their cases more like poker. The should remove the possibility that bullying tactics will weaken their ability to keep the case about law.

    Side note:

    The word Bully has changed over time. The earliest meaning in English was “sweetheart.” (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bully). The meaning later changed to something akin to “a good chap” or “a fine chap,” and later to “fine” as in “I feel fine.” From there, bully went on to mean drunk (think of an intoxicated person’s response to the bartender’s inquiry. “I’m fine.”)

    The last meaning is used in the sea shanty Bully in The Alley where bully means drunk, feeling fine and left the alley. It’s the association with drunkenness that leads to the modern usage. Drunks oft become belligerent, and there we go. Bully now refers to someone who, convincingly, threatens violence to get their way.

←Previous Page
1 2 3
Next Page→

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Fact(mostly), Fiction and Opinion
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Fact(mostly), Fiction and Opinion
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar